shar-vell Dan
Well-known member
Gibb sun is like the mother that eats its young.
Tbh I couldn't care less about Gibson.It's funny how this forum in particular turns on any regular who goes out and makes a buck on a YouTube.
Sucks for Fluff. I love Mesa amps but the firing of Randall has been a sore issue, I'm reluctant to buy anything new until I see forward progress under Gibson' rule... unlikely to happen though.
It's funny how this forum in particular turns on any regular who goes out and makes a buck on a YouTube.
Sucks for Fluff.
The reason it's annoying if not outright offensive is because it's so obviously manipulative. We're talking Idiocracy levels obvious, which seems to be common denominator these days. I'm glad to know my RT brethren can see it!My father HATED beavis and butthead when i was a kid, not because kids were watching and cutting down telephone poles or playing frog baseball, or it just wasnt funny, he just couldnt handle that one dude was making a ton of money off something as easy to do in his eyes as making a stupid cartoon, it literally drove him bat shit crazy the same way "clickbait titles" or a stupid face in the thumbnail does for many here. i gotta believe dudes just cant take average guitar players are getting paid and becoming internet famous from reviewing gear they are getting sent to them because of their success, i just cant see how something as trivial as the title of a video setting people off the way it does.
The reason it's annoying if not outright offensive is because it's so obviously manipulative. We're talking Idiocracy levels obvious, which seems to be common denominator these days. I'm glad to know my RT brethren can see it!
Agreed. And as for being manipulative; is the YouTube gear shilling really that different than the guitar gear reviews in the magazines of 80's, 90's through early 00's?i cant imagine being annoyed and offended over a silly over the top title of a video but i guess we are all different
It's not the subtle promotion of the gear in the form of a "review" that I'm objecting to. It's the blatant gaming of YouTube algos and attempt on your attention. It's not the biggest deal, just in keeping with the slow degradation of our culture a la Idiocracy. If it doesn't bother you, more power to you!Agreed. And as for being manipulative; is the YouTube gear shilling really that different than the guitar gear reviews in the magazines of 80's, 90's through early 00's?