chumbucket":2p1bnkxy said:
Steve, your argument about the advantages only benefit the builder in terms of build speed (and profits essentially).
No, you see, that is where you are wrong. You, the buyer, benefit from a less expensive, more consistent sounding, more easily maintainable and more available amplifier. Also, let's get real specific here - I am talking about complex, modern channel switchers like the CCV, not single channel amps that are reasonably cost effective to build hand-wired turret design. It is much easier to make the lead dress consistent on a single channel (although as many old Marshalls prove - not fool proof), and unless you are really stamping them out like Marshall, quick enough to build. Channel switchers, with loops, midi, etc are much too complex to build this way if there is reasonable demand. They are going to cost more because they take more time. Personally, I still would not shy away from a single channel PCB amp made with quality components and boards...
I think your experiences with PCB amps have more to do with cheaper components and mass manufacturing than anything inherent in PCB design. I'll also say you have been lucky with your turret board Marshalls, as an absolutely common complaint is how different one old Marshall sounds from another. Components do not wear any differently on a PCB than on a turret board - that is common sense. There should be no reason a qualifed tech lifts a solder trace replacing a component or any other "weirdness".
Choose whatever works for you, but there is no reason to believe a well built, PCB designed amp using really good components like the CCV will not give you great tone and many years of trouble free service...
Steve