IHateRap
Well-known member
This is the kind of thread where you type something out and then erase it and start over multiple times.
Huh? This is exactly the place for this kind of discussion. You don't have to have the ability to make better product in order to have an opinion. I can't write or direct a movie, but I still have opinions and vote with my wallet. I also thought Wolf's music was fine but nothing that jumps out from the majority of rock out there. He is selling a product and we have the choice of buying or not based on what we think, not based on what we can or can't do.Can you write, track, sing, produce, and record anything better? I’m not saying you’re not allowed to have your own opinion. You absolutely are. But unless you’ve got some originals lying around that blow that song away, your negative critique of someone else’s artistic creation comes off as petty. That’s just my honest opinion. I may be 100% wrong here, but seriously, post some of your stuff up. Let us hear it. How does your original material stack up to what you’re criticizing?
Did I say that he didn’t have a “right” to have an opinion? As a matter of fact, pretty sure I said the opposite.Huh? This is exactly the place for this kind of discussion. You don't have to have the ability to make better product in order to have an opinion. I can't write or direct a movie, but I still have opinions and vote with my wallet. I also thought Wolf's music was fine but nothing that jumps out from the majority of rock out there. He is selling a product and we have the choice of buying or not based on what we think, not based on what we can or can't do.
You challenged the entire validity of his opinion based on what your opinion would have been if he offered a useless answer to your challenge to make something better. So, basically your post was a massive logic contradiction.Did I say that he didn’t have a “right” to have an opinion? As a matter of fact, pretty sure I said the opposite.
I don’t think that’s entirely so. My opinion of the material or even of his opinion would not have changed regardless of what he produced. I guess this boils down to respect, for me, rather than the validity of an opinion. I think some opinions can be more informed, but I don’t think opinions can be valid or invalid, that’s why it’s opinion and not fact. Bottom line for me, it’s easier to sit back and criticize a song than it is to create your own.You challenged the entire validity of his opinion based on what your opinion would have been if he offered a useless answer to your challenge to make something better. So, basically your post was a massive logic contradiction.
You challenged the entire validity of his opinion based on what your opinion would have been if he offered a useless answer to your challenge to make something better. So, basically your post was a massive logic contradiction.
I could be wrong here, and I’m honestly attempting to understand. I don’t know if I necessarily agree with “a valid opinion begins and ends with a subjective statement.” I’m not sure an opinion can be valid or invalid. I can know nothing about something and still have an opinion on it. Can there even be objective scrutiny when it comes to whether a piece of music is good or not? Is this correct: objective scrutiny in relation to music would simply be whether it exists or not, i.e., “Stairway to Heaven” exists and is objective fact. Or, “this song is in 4/4 time.” Those are objective statements. Whether or not it is a good song is subjective to the listener.A valid opinion begins and ends with it being a subjective statement. The moment you make an objective claim with an opinion, you can easily attack the opinion. If I say something objectively sucks, not simply that I don't like it or I think it is nothing special, that opens the statement up to objective scrutiny.
I could be wrong here, and I’m honestly attempting to understand. I don’t know if I necessarily agree with “a valid opinion begins and ends with a subjective statement.” I’m not sure an opinion can be valid or invalid. I can know nothing about something and still have an opinion on it. Can there even be objective scrutiny when it comes to whether a piece of music is good or not? Is this correct: objective scrutiny in relation to music would simply be whether it exists or not, i.e., “Stairway to Heaven” exists and is objective fact. Or, “this song is in 4/4 time.” Those are objective statements. Whether or not it is a good song is subjective to the listener.
I’m very critical. I see no need to celebrate mediocrity or patronize anyone. People may think I’m an asshole because I’m honest, but I’d rather that than be a wind bag. I’m a big nobody though, so take my opinion with a grain of sand.I hear what you’re saying here. You have every right to say you don’t like something. More power to you. On the other hand, you certainly aren’t shy about posting a negative opinion. I’ve been around here a long time. I can say with near certainty that if someone posts up a band or song they like, it’s at least an 80% chance that you’re gonna say you don’t like it or it’s not that good. Along those lines, I can say with 100% certainty that if someone posts a thread about a SLO, you’re going to chime in with how overrated they are or how they do nothing for you. It’s like clockwork.
But again, you have every right to speak your mind. I pretty much knew when I saw this thread and then listened to the track that you were going to say something negative about it, how it wasn’t that good. You do it a lot, man. You’re super critical, which is fine, maybe even good for all I know. You’re calling it like you see it just as I am here. You’re a killer guitarist with the best Marshalls I’ve ever heard, but dang if you aren’t super critical of other people’s original material.
I know what you are saying dude... I said it wasn't my cup of tea because it's just not the type of music I'm into. My honest opinion is it reminds me of Nickelback or something along those lines.. some might take that as a dis but Nickelback has a fuck ton of fans and money so they must be doing something right, right? lol... anyway I appreciate just about all types of music and feel bad this dude has such a high bar placed in front of him. I think he has a lot in common with Jason Bonham... Jason is a good drummer and all but he is no John Bonham.I’m very critical. I see no need to celebrate mediocrity or patronize anyone. People may think I’m an asshole because I’m honest, but I’d rather that than be a wind bag. I’m a big nobody though, so take my opinion with a grain of sand.
I’ll use Rocco as an example, I’ve heard him play some stuff that was just ok, and I’ll say that. The other day he posted something and I liked it. So much so that I’m stealing his riff. https://www.rig-talk.com/forum/threads/axe-fx-iii-evh5150iii-metal.219732/
Haha I like that term wind bag. I’ll have to start using it because there are a lot of them out there these daysI’m very critical. I see no need to celebrate mediocrity or patronize anyone. People may think I’m an asshole because I’m honest, but I’d rather that than be a wind bag. I’m a big nobody though, so take my opinion with a grain of sand.
I’ll use Rocco as an example, I’ve heard him play some stuff that was just ok, and I’ll say that. The other day he posted something and I liked it. So much so that I’m stealing his riff. https://www.rig-talk.com/forum/threads/axe-fx-iii-evh5150iii-metal.219732/
Love everything about this! Hang till the end for more funnies.