acceptance
Well-known member
It's Wikipedia, just sharing to describe the experiment.It is according to your link
It's Wikipedia, just sharing to describe the experiment.It is according to your link
Unless one believes in the unscriptural day-age theory, the plants only had to survive a day or two until they received "real" light.Notice he makes plants before he makes the sun, an apparent contradiction but the light of Christ illumines all of creation.
The huge inland sea that would've been left-behind after the flood eventually sprung a leak and carved that channel through the mountains, dumping a ridiculous amount of silt into the Gulf of Mexico. It would've happened quickly and it's the only rational explanation.My belief is that the Grand Canyon is 5+ million years old and carved by a river.
Are they made of granite?I also believe the Appalachia Mts are 5 billion years old - roughly, and were at one time molten like magma.
Except time is determined by the sun and moon. So if there is no sun, what's a "day" mean. The only answer can be an indeterminate period of time known by God.Unless one believes in the unscriptural day-age theory, the plants only had to survive a day or two until they received "real" light.
Time is determined by how fast the Earth spinsExcept time is determined by the sun and moon. So if there is no sun, what's a "day" mean. The only answer can be an indeterminate period of time known by God.
How we identify time is determined by how fast the earth spins. Time itself is a concept and not subject to physical forces.Time is determined by how fast the Earth spins
Not entirely true. Time can be affected by gravitational forces or speed and be based on an observers position relative to the force. One example would be time dilation as you approach the speed of light. Time passes differently for the object in motion vs a stationary observer.How we identify time is determined by how fast the earth spins. Time itself is a concept and not subject to physical forces.
Is this Einstein's contribution?Not entirely true. Time can be affected by gravitational forces or speed and be based on an observers position relative to the force. One example would be time dilation as you approach the speed of light. Time passes differently for the object in motion vs a stationary observer.
Yeah, it's part of special relativity.Is this Einstein's contribution?
It’s also clearly demonstrable with satellites and gpsIs this Einstein's contribution?
Most space X launches are pretty well documented. They just had another one a couple days ago I thinkIs anyone aware of any video footage showing the entirety of a rocket leaving the earth to space?
I guess I don’t understand how the actual passage of time can be altered, period.It’s also clearly demonstrable with satellites and gps
It's not so much that time is altered. It's more complex than this, but basically the perception of the passage of time is different based on your frame of reference.I guess I don’t understand how the actual passage of time can be altered, period.
Link me!Most space X launches are pretty well documented. They just had another one a couple days ago I think
Can we preface this by saying, "According to Einstein's special relativity..."It's not so much that time is altered. It's more complex than this, but basically the perception of the passage of time is different based on your frame of reference.
For someone who is traveling near the speed of light time passes slower for them than someone who is not moving.
For gravity, the closer you are to the center of mass of an object the the slower time moves for you. We're talking fractions of nanoseconds here, but technically someone who lives at sea level would be younger than someone who lives in the mountains.
This is actually a nifty real world thing that demonstrates both aspects of time dilation due to gravity and speed. Astronaut Scott Kelly is now slightly older than his twin because of his time spent in space.
https://www.sciencealert.com/in-spa...owly-than-his-brother-on-earth-and-here-s-why
So you’re saying that your body would physically age slower ? Your perception of the passage of time based on a previous frame of reference may be a mental phenomenon but I don’t see how it can be an actual physical possibility. I get that it’s theoretical but Dan said it can be proven with satellites and GPS. What’s that about ?It's not so much that time is altered. It's more complex than this, but basically the perception of the passage of time is different based on your frame of reference.
For someone who is traveling near the speed of light time passes slower for them than someone who is not moving.
For gravity, the closer you are to the center of mass of an object the the slower time moves for you. We're talking fractions of nanoseconds here, but technically someone who lives at sea level would be younger than someone who lives in the mountains.
This is actually a nifty real world thing that demonstrates both aspects of time dilation due to gravity and speed. Astronaut Scott Kelly is now slightly older than his twin because of his time spent in space.
https://www.sciencealert.com/in-spa...owly-than-his-brother-on-earth-and-here-s-why
Why? can you not have a conversation without putting qualifiers on or questioning everything when you don't understand how something works?Can we preface this by saying, "According to Einstein's special relativity..."
Thank you.
Because like your vaunted "globe" and much else in modern science, it is only theoretical, indemonstrable in every day life. You pronounce it like it's the Gospel truth.Why? can you not have a conversation without putting qualifiers on or questioning everything when you don't understand how something works?
Are you new here ?Why? can you not have a conversation without putting qualifiers on or questioning everything when you don't understand how something works?