MontiCristo
Well-known member
Oh I don’t feel sonYou seem like you feel knowledgeable about theology but you could not tell me the procession of the holy spirit. Does it proceed from the father alone or the son also?
I know
Oh I don’t feel sonYou seem like you feel knowledgeable about theology but you could not tell me the procession of the holy spirit. Does it proceed from the father alone or the son also?
Then your answer was non biblical, wrong, and heretical.It’s not an “IT” He is God
And I answered you.
So far you aren't doing very good with your one viewer, acceptance. I think he is open minded enough to realize that holy tradition plays a part of early christianity whereas you are in complete denial stuck in your sola scriptura heresy.The rambling inconsistency of someone constantly claiming “tradition, tradition” with no supporting text, or the words of the Bible.
It would seem to be impossible for tradition not to have played a part. No one disputes that the scriptures came decades or even centuries later.I think he is open minded enough to realize that holy tradition plays a part of early christianity whereas you are in complete denial stuck in your sola scriptura heresy.
Well when this “tradition” of yours can ever be read or viewed so that we may confirm its accuracy you let us know. In the meantime, Christ is Lord and His word is the only authority that binds a man’s conscience.Then your answer was non biblical, wrong, and heretical.
So far you aren't doing very good with your one viewer, acceptance. I think he is open minded enough to realize that holy tradition plays a part of early christianity whereas you are in complete denial stuck in your sola scriptura heresy.
That's a serious problem for the sola scriptura crowd. How can you claim solely scripture when christianity existed 200 years before a complete NT ever did and the people who wrote the gospels were all orthodox christian?It would seem to be impossible for tradition not to have played a part. No one disputes that the scriptures came decades or even centuries later.
The writings of the early church fathers are there for the taking it's just that your heretical version of christianity mostly ignores it all. No one hid it from your except your church leaders.Well when this “tradition” of yours can ever be read or viewed so that we may confirm its accuracy you let us
yall are unbelievably obtuseIt would seem to be impossible for tradition not to have played a part. No one disputes that the scriptures came decades or even centuries later.
wrongThat's a serious problem for the sola scriptura crowd. How can you claim solely scripture when christianity existed 200 years before a complete NT ever did and the people who wrote the gospels were all orthodox christian?
“My heretical version of Christianity”The writings of the early church fathers are there for the taking it's just that your heretical version of christianity mostly ignores it all. No one hid it from your except your church leaders.
Yes of course, you have some books, but not a complete old testament for 200 years after the church was founded. So prior to the gospels you sat around and did what? Sipped coffee? Sang a few gospel songs that hadn't been written yet? Listened to someone preach a sermon on books that hadn't been written yet?We have early manuscripts of the gospel of John as early as AD49
James 2:18To have faith in Jesus Christ alone
Have I misunderstood? I thought you were arguing that tradition is not authoritative.yall are unbelievably obtuse
The debate is not whether tradition has a part
You are arguing against someone that used to be a protestant. My whole church is full of people who left your protestant churches for orthodoxy. When you come, you will be welcomed home too.If any of yall can actually get this dude to produce any evidence whatsoever for the specific claims he has made, let me know. Message me.
The evidence is the church itself I imagine.I’m going to bed
If any of yall can actually get this dude to produce any evidence whatsoever for the specific claims he has made, let me know. Message me.
He's protestant so he really doesn't know what he believes, he just thinks he does. I was there once before myself and I sounded almost exactly like him.Have I misunderstood? I thought you were arguing that tradition is not authoritative.
Yes of course, you have some books, but not a complete old testament for 200 years after the church was founded. So prior to the gospels you sat around and did what? Sipped coffee? Sang a few gospel songs that hadn't been written yet? Listened to someone preach a sermon on books that hadn't been written yet?
Well I’m not a cannibalist I can assure you of that. Cringe. YuckHe's protestant so he really doesn't know what he believes, he just thinks he does. I was there once before myself and I sounded almost exactly like him.
And you’re starting to anger meWell I’m not a cannibalist I can assure you of that. Cringe. Yuck
It is because it has been preserved unconquerable. If there is no visible body of christ then it's all a lie because it would mean we are awash in a world of disinfo and deceit about our Lord. There has to be one church that has maintained the true faith or they are all liars, no? That church is the eastern orthodox church which was founded by the apostles. These same apostles also taught the holy traditions which have been preserved in orthodoxy.The evidence is the church itself I imagine.
I don't doubt it, you're deep in heresy right now so pretty much everything you believe is detestable to Christ. You even call his mother a common sinful woman. You should be rapped across the mouth quite honestly.Well I’m not a cannibalist I can assure you of that. Cringe. Yuck