RaceU4her
Well-known member
cant say this one is doing much for me, sounds kinda bloated and the gain structure just sounds not together if that makes any sense?? great demo as always though
And that’s why they can’t be trusted.Personally I've been able to dial better tones with a good reactive load and IR's than I ever have been able to get with real cabs and mics.
And that’s why they can’t be trusted.
I agree, but I think it’s partly because these amps (at least the other Ubers) shine more for more modern styles of metal or at least music more in that directionI much prefer your Marshalls over this amp..
Oh I know they can sound great. Sometimes they sound a little too good and aren’t accurate representations of how the amp will sound in a room.It does take a while to find good ones yeah. But once you find one (or a blend of them) you love, then that sound becomes just as trustworthy as any real mic’d cab tone.
Does this mean you also don't trust a clip of a mic'd cab where the person is exceptionally skilled at mic placement vs the average Joe?And that’s why they can’t be trusted.
I'd say no recorded signal full stop captures the sound of an amp in a room..Oh I know they can sound great. Sometimes they sound a little too good and aren’t accurate representations of how the amp will sound in a room.
I'd say no recorded signal full stop captures the sound of an amp in a room..
They're 2 totally different things.
Since I'm the only one who hears an amp in a room and everybody else will hear it recorded or in a mix... I therefore care way more about how an amp sounds recorded than in the room.
But that's just me.
This is why I laugh at the modeling vs real amp crowd.
We are also completely opposite - I care about how the amp sounds in the room over how it’s recorded. You can always adjust or tweak with recordings to make an amp sound how you believe it’s perceived in person.
Unless you’re me playing it in the room.I'd say no recorded signal full stop captures the sound of an amp in a room..
They're 2 totally different things.
Since I'm the only one who hears an amp in a room and everybody else will hear it recorded or in a mix... I therefore care way more about how an amp sounds recorded than in the room.
But that's just me.
Yep, big 'ol can of worms and, like anything tone related - there will never be agreement amongst us.oh man I think this is another can of worms again
I’m also talking about trying to gauge an amp to potentially purchase. I bought an amp before that sounded monstrous in an IR recorded clip, only to be very disappointed when it arrived.This is why I laugh at the modeling vs real amp crowd.
We are also completely opposite - I care about how the amp sounds in the room over how it’s recorded. You can always adjust or tweak with recordings to make an amp sound how you believe it’s perceived in person.
It’s why I invested over $5,000 in recording gear this year. The enmity will be something I’ll offer in limited runs but not before capturing what I’ve already got and setting up a website. No way would I offer mods based on IRs alone.I’m also talking about trying to gauge an amp to potentially purchase. I bought an amp before that sounded monstrous in an IR recorded clip, o lot be very disappointed when it arrived.
Totally agree mate.Yep, big 'ol can of worms and, like anything tone related - there will never be agreement amongst us.
I've never heard a recording that sounds like actually being in the room, others say they have. When I hear them, it just sounds like a 'roomy' and indistinct recording, but not like being in the room at all...and this is where is becomes totally subjective and the wheels fall off.
The I.R thing is well established and can indeed sound excellent, and I'm a cab-miking die hard. The main issue as I see it, is that there are far more bad examples about than good.
I can say definitively though, when an I.R is created and utilised well by sufficiently skilled users - it can range from very good sounding, to completely indistinguishable from a miked cab. The latter is less common than the former of course, but it is possible!
It's a philosophical difference which even exists between players and mix engineers. Amps that are mic'd or through an IR are not a good representation of what an amp sounds like in the room. Some people will not ever track and just want the experience of being in the same room as the amp to play. That is valid. When you track guitars in a mix context, the "in the room feeling" is not important as you are trying to capture a piece of air with a mic that has the characteristics you want in a mix. Way different than capturing allllll the data from the source. That is also valid. It's just about intended use in my opinion and what you value. I think there are some great IR makers and very talented engineers who know how to mic a cab (and also have great gear and great knowlege with how to use said gear to get the sound)--but there are some very bad examples of IRs/traditional recording also. I, personally, do not mind an IR, particularly if it is well done and consistent between amps as I can spot some of the differences with some of the variables removed.Totally agree mate.
The other thing guys forget is there's plenty of poor examples of micing too.
You're relying on people's skill and experience regardless of what option you take.
I use both IR and miked and both can get you there.
Then there's the whole 'amazing amps that guys make sound totally crap' and vice versa.
We seem to blame the technology or gear before blaming the player these days.
Maybe i'm just old man yelling at cloud
I still have no idea how to set this amp up. I land on different settings every time I turn it on- so many options, especially on channel 2.
Anyway, couple sounds I got yesterday. Should have put tape over the damn LEDs