What percentage if libs take SSRI's? 90%?Liberalism isn't a mental disorder. Maybe more left identifying or progressive cult types have mental disorders, sure.
What percentage if libs take SSRI's? 90%?Liberalism isn't a mental disorder. Maybe more left identifying or progressive cult types have mental disorders, sure.
I think you all are off in calling them liberals. I doubt that figure, but I'm aware of studies that do show higher incidence of mental issues.What percentage if libs take SSRI's? 90%?
Libs, leftists, progressives, idiots, what's the difference?I think you all are off in calling them liberals. I doubt that figure, but I'm aware of studies that do show higher incidence of mental issues.
You can't say that here, mate.
The moderators are gonna "What do you mean by that?" the shit out of you now.
Well, liberalism is an ideology that bears little resemblance to today's understanding of the term. Today's democrats and progressives are not liberal. Liberalism is more akin to libertarianism.Libs, leftists, progressives, idiots, what's the difference?
I think there was few more between him and JBT. Arch has been on a hyper annoying kick for a week or so. Some might argue longer.Is this the post that got you banned?
Let us know when you come back.
That might have been true 20 years ago.Well, liberalism is an ideology that bears little resemblance to todays understanding of the term. Today's democrats and progressives are not liberal. Liberalism is more akin to libertarianism.
Well, I'm not ceding the word. Progressives have been playing word games for too long. They are not liberal and neither are democrats. They are interventionists, control freaks and authoritarians.That might have been true 20 years ago.
If you don't know if you're male or female, that's certainly a mental issue.I think you all are off in calling them liberals. I doubt that figure, but I'm aware of studies that do show higher incidence of mental issues.
You misunderstood again. I didn't claim to hand you your dumbass, life itself will do that was my point.Oh and you handed my dumb ass to me?
Why don’t you take a few history classes and quit watching your fucking TV and then get back to me genius.
I didn’t call you any names. Nor do I think you’re an enemy. You’re a random dude on the internet who thinks the constitution is a living document to be changed with public opinion.You misunderstood again. I didn't claim to hand you your dumbass, life itself will do that was my point.
Funny/odd that you and I (and many others here) agree on almost everything, especially politics but it took only one difference of opinion to make us online enemies and devolve into name-calling and insults. I try to reserve that for libtards and morally bankrupt people trying to ruin society.
I don’t think the constitution is a "living document", all our freedoms are based on it.I didn’t call you any names. Nor do I think you’re an enemy. You’re a random dude on the internet who thinks the constitution is a living document to be changed with public opinion.
As for life doing blah blah blah. Dude, I’m 56 and been through a lot more than anyone here knows or will ever know and I’m still here so….
Clearly you do dude. The 2A was intended for us to be as well armed as the government. What it says, Shall not be infringed. What it doesn’t say, except for military weapons.I don’t think the constitution is a "living document", all our freedoms are based on it.
Roe v Wade was an amendment enacted by liberals in charge, it took a conservative govt with a conscience to change it back...does that qualify as a "living document"? One was wrong, the other right.
It's not even comparable: keeping military grade weapons out of the hands of demented mass murderers vs disarming the US population...even the most liberal of politicians knows what would happen if general gun confiscation was attempted, and why we have the 2nd.
It looks eerily close to the M16 I carried but the AR holds more rounds. OK, not military.Clearly you do dude. The 2A was intended for us to be as well armed as the government. What it says, Shall not be infringed. What it doesn’t say, except for military weapons.
And again, an AR-15 is not a military weapon. And advocating for banning them is what anti- gun people do. So……….
Also not full auto. Also the AR-15, came BEFORE the M16 and was designed and built for civilian use. And they hold the exact same number of rounds, you were just issued 20 rd. mags. Which also means you’re old because they now issue 30 rd. PMags with M4s ( M4 is the current military classification )It looks eerily close to the M16 I carried but the AR holds more rounds. OK, not military.
Millions and millions and millions in civilian hands currently. By far the most popular rifle in America and by far passes the “ common use” litmus test antis used to ban certain classes of firearms.I had no idea the AR was that old, it must have flown under the radar for many years. I became aware of it after conservative govt (and the NRA) loosened the government's grip on personal firearms (Reagan administration?) which i was extremely thankful for.
My first handgun after exiting the military (mid 70s) was a Ruger 22 mag western pistol. It required me to go to the sheriff's office to get it (and myself) registered and a permit issued. I never want to go back to those days, no way.