Throw Away Your Masks

  • Thread starter Thread starter lll
  • Start date Start date
Virus is NOT bound to the saliva.. which is why people wear hazmat suits when working with viruses... it is the VAPOR from the breath that carries the virus. This is basic biology that doctors (who are paid off) ignore, which doctors who are bringing this is up is being black-balled.
 
virus is .16 nanos... holes in masks 6 nanos... like stopping mosquitos with a chain-link fence. Also, how many times have you seen those 'black worms' in masks (videos). Here's one from a doctor who investigated because her kids were watching these videos:

https://newtube.app/user/PhilStone/5Ik5smb
Why are they there and what is their purpose... nanobots for what purpose?

Here's an experiment for you:

Put some flour in a strainer, observe, and take notes.
Now mix flour with water, then put mixture in the same strainer.

Look in the mirror to see the look on your face when you get it (y)
 
Only way it dries up is if its not on your face. Exhale onto a mirror, or glass to find out why.
Let's talk about bacterial pneumonia and other health disorders from breathing in that crap. Medical professionals change masks after only an hour or so, whereas people are wearing those face diapers for several hours on end. Also, I think I can see an anagram in your user name, Cuntz.
 
Virus is NOT bound to the saliva.. which is why people wear hazmat suits when working with viruses... it is the VAPOR from the breath that carries the virus. This is basic biology that doctors (who are paid off) ignore, which doctors who are bringing this is up is being black-balled.

Vapor is liquid, which is what your saliva is. haha Jesus
 
Here's an experiment for you:

Put some flour in a strainer, observe, and take notes.
Now mix flour with water, then put mixture in the same strainer.

Look in the mirror to see the look on your face when you get it (y)
Why not show me with a video, as I'm not about to do what you're asking, which is IRRELEVANT to what is being found in 'sterile' face masks. If you have other evidence, you may want to share that with the medical professionals coming forward. You working with the Demonrats?
 
Why not show me with a video, as I'm not about to do what you're asking, which is IRRELEVANT to what is being found in 'sterile' face masks. If you have other evidence, you may want to share that with the medical professionals coming forward. You working with the Demonrats?
 
Thank you... it's called basic grade-school science. You shouldn't have been smoking pot during recess. And I'll watch your video after you watch the one I put up, along with the research on MASKS DON'T WORK.
 
sheeple-masks.jpg
 
Hey, that's my pic from the other day, bro'. :LOL:

virus is .16 nanos... holes in masks 6 nanos...
I think it's more like 50+ nanos for the virus and 60+ microns for masks.

IOW, roughly 1000x-bigger holes than would theoretically be required for 100% effectiveness.
 
I think it's more like 50+ nanos for the virus and 60+ microns for masks.

IOW, roughly 1000x-bigger holes that would theoretically be required for 100% effectiveness.
Could be... it's what I 'recall' from a video with a surgeon, but memory and all...
 
Preach, brother. :LOL:

Now, what was I saying? Oh yeah... nothin'. :confused:
 
 
Back
Top