Trump elected: what happens next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter acceptance
  • Start date Start date
Does it ever cross your mind that there might be biblical implications behind it? I know you aren't a believer but I just wanted to hear your take while we were talking. No judgments. It's a complex issue so I like to hear you and acceptance talk about it more than I care to participate, lol.

The interesting thing about this point in history is that all major religions universally acknowledge that the end is nigh.

In Christianity, it’s called Judgment Day, and there has been a lot of hysteria about the Anti-Christ.

In Islam, they talk of the coming of the “Mahdi”

In Judaism, they talk of “Gideon”.

In Hinduism, they talk of the “Kalyug” age, where evil men will rule the earth till a saviour comes for the just and meek.

It’s pretty wild, when you think about it. In all those religious texts, there are also parallels between figures like Jesus, Krishna and Moses.

In both the Jesus and Moses stories, when they are born, at a time specified and provided to their would-be murderers by God, I’m assuming, there are mass culls of babies in an attempt to kill them.

In the Krishna story, the villain is given specific information down to the family that the child will be born to, but events go south for him, including an incident that involves the “parting” of a waterway.

Just got to hope that when the Anti-Christ comes/came, they didn’t butcher thousands of children worldwide.

It would be an interesting progression, assuming I have the timeline right:
- Krishna, babies of single family murdered, survives
-Moses, babies of multiple families murdered, survives
-Jesus, babies of (even more) multiple families murdered, survives
-Anti-Christ, babies of multiple families murdered, does not survive/survives?

This could be all bullshit, ffs, so take it all with a pinch of salt. I love reading that stuff.
 
So your “evidence” is all coming from activists. Makes sense.
The Josh Paul segment. He was a state department official and said that the state department investigated the allegations of rape of a 13 boy and found them credible. The next day the IDF raided the DCIP (The organiztion making the complaint), removed their computers and declared them TERRORISTS!

It's so easy with people like you. Just slap a label and everything is okay! 🤡
 
The Josh Paul segment. He was a state department official and said that the state department investigated the allegations of rape of a 13 boy and found them credible. The next day the IDF raided the DCIP (The organiztion making the complaint), removed their computers and declared them TERRORISTS!

It's so easy with people like you. Just slap a label and everything is okay! 🤡
Coming from a guy who calls what happened on Oct. 7 legal armed resistance.
 
Did the Jews fire missiles at them and then hide in schools ?

Ah, this is a crazy bit of lost history. When the division of the land now occupied by Israeli and the Palestinians first took place, the first ever bombing was by Israeli radicals on a popular Arab hotel. It’s pretty well-documented.
 
And dude, I remember you making that argument like immediately. Long before all this other shit you spout from Al Jazeera or wherever the fuck you get it. Long before Oct. 7 you had a hard on for Israel. They could give every terrorist piece of shit in Gaza a million dollars and you'd figure a way to call it genocide.
 
“Civil” war. Lol

Well, you may die but at least you know you fought a fair fight. 🙄

What does your civil sensibilities and the Geneva convention say about staging attacks from within civilian populations ? Or attacking and killing 1200 civilians and kidnapping and torturing 200 more ?
If war should have no bounds then why are you complaining about Hamas? Like I keep telling you, you have to either have a moral and principled objection or a practical utilitarian argument. Can't have it both ways. If genocide is okay, if rape is okay, if killing civilians is okay, then it's okay for Hamas too. I don't believe it's acceptable for either.
 
Ah, this is a crazy bit of lost history. When the division of the land now occupied by Israeli and the Palestinians first took place, the first ever bombing was by Israeli radicals on a popular Arab hotel. It’s pretty well-documented.
Dude, those were attacks against the occupying British, not Arabs.
 
If war should have no bounds then why are you complaining about Hamas? Like I keep telling you, you have to either have a moral and principled objection or a practical utilitarian argument. Can't have it both ways. If genocide is okay, if rape is okay, if killing civilians is okay, then it's okay for Hamas too. I don't believe it's acceptable for either.
You're the only one complaining dude. If it wasn't for all the complaining about what Israel does I'm quite sure this whole affair would already be over. You are seeking to force restraint on Israel while justifying Hamas terrorism. Anything I am saying about Hamas is in justification of the Israeli military campaign you keep complaining about.
 
Dude, those were attacks against the occupying British, not Arabs.
Nonetheless, it was an instance of Israeli terrorism that you were aware of. It would be one thing if you were anti-terrorism on principle and didn't know anything of the history of Israeli terrorism... Starting to smell a rat. 🙁
 
And it makes no difference what Josh Paul's job is. Dude is a fucking shill plain and simple. Nothing about that mother fucker is unbiased.
 
Nonetheless, it was an instance of Israeli terrorism that you were aware of. It would be one thing if you were anti-terrorism on principle and didn't know anything of the history of Israeli terrorism... Starting to smell a rat. 🙁
It was also not perpetrated by Israeli "Leaders". I knew about that too.
 
Regarding the Israeli "Terrorists" who's goal was to rid Palestine of the occupying British.

"Those militants belonged to two clandestine organizations, whose complex genealogy Hoffman explains in detail. Their story begins in 1929, when a series of Arab pogroms against Jews broke out across Palestine; altogether, 133 Jews were killed and more than 300 injured. These attacks made clear that the Yishuv needed an organized self-defense force, which it found in the Haganah (the Hebrew word means “defense”), an amateur volunteer group that was now put on official footing and greatly expanded. It was placed under the control of the Histadrut, the Jewish labor federation, which was the leading political institution in Jewish Palestine."

1929 Arab pogrom against the Jews ? hmm.
 
As I said, history always only starts when your favored groups are attacked. And when they are attacked, a little terrorism or genocide is fine.
Well then why don't you school the class on what it was that happened before those 1929 pogroms professor ?
 
Also I didn't give an opinion on those bits of terrorism one way or another. I just pointed out it wasn't Israeli leaders doing it.
 
Back
Top