Tucker interview of Putin

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsm
  • Start date Start date
As for who starts this or that, I've been a kindergarten teacher here for long-enough to know that it matters not.
Further to this:

I've been consistent on this since day dot. Sometimes the left is offended, sometimes the right. It always takes 2 to tango. Always.
 
Build a moat and stock it with fish and lizards.
It works 60% of the time, every time.
Oddly enough, the answer is "barn cats".

We have 2 that my wife got from an old woman who had a ton of half-feral cats and was giving them away on the Facebook..

The cats destroy the food source for the snakes and the spiders, and only cost a can of tuna a day. ?
 
Oddly enough, the answer is "barn cats".

We have 2 that my wife got from an old woman who had a ton of half-feral cats and was giving them away on the Facebook..

The cats destroy the food source for the snakes and the spiders, and only cost a can of tuna a day. ?

Yeah, but did you get a Chupacabra to keep the cat population under control?
 
Yeah, but did you get a Chupacabra to keep the cat population under control?
I lost 2 registered Nubian dairy goats to the Chupa, several years ago.

When I found them, rigor mortis had already set in.

Field autopsy showed their bodies had been drained of all blood.

AFBuWRU.jpg
 
I lost 2 registered Nubian dairy goats to the Chupa, several years ago.

When I found them, rigor mortis had already set in.

Field autopsy showed their bodies had been drained of all blood.

AFBuWRU.jpg

That's a perfect example of why you shouldn't register things.
Government is so useless that they can't even keep the dairy registries protected from vagrants.
 
No I'm not - I continually correcting you and telling you what your own Government and scientists report. My views are completely mainstream. Yours are radical.
Yes your views are “mainstream” but they are still based on lies and a lack of critical thinking in my opinion. You realize that everyone in the Soviet Union was convinced that communism was “working”, right?
As for offensive - I find it offensive and unreasonable to support dictators that brutally attack their neighbours.
What constitutes support? Agreeing with Putin on his view of the conflict? You’re saying that I’m not allowed to think for myself and form my own opinions? How is that different from what they do in Russia? And why do you believe Putin is a dictator? What evidence do you have? …regarding “Brutal attacks” you have no moral high ground to make that claim in my view given your support for Israel in Gaza.
I also find it offensive to the 1.64 million people that died in the US to dismiss COVID as just a seasonal flu.
As others have said, there is a difference between dying with COVID and dying of it. The numbers are bs. The final tally put the actual risk at less than the flu for most of the population, but of course you’ll never hear that from the MSM that promoted the nonsense the whole way through. It might be tough to accept, but the fact is that you’ve been misled about the whole thing.
 
I remember when the media even noted the average age of death from COVID was freaking higher than the average life expectancy here in the US. I thought that for sure would get people thinking, but no, the hypnosis continued until finally Putin invaded Ukraine of all things. In some ways he saved the west from a total neurotic breakdown.
 
Yes your views are “mainstream” but they are still based on lies and a lack of critical thinking in my opinion. You realize that everyone in the Soviet Union was convinced that communism was “working”, right?

What constitutes support? Agreeing with Putin on his view of the conflict? You’re saying that I’m not allowed to think for myself and form my own opinions? How is that different from what they do in Russia? And why do you believe Putin is a dictator? What evidence do you have? …regarding “Brutal attacks” you have no moral high ground to make that claim in my view given your support for Israel in Gaza.

As others have said, there is a difference between dying with COVID and dying of it. The numbers are bs. The final tally put the actual risk at less than the flu for most of the population, but of course you’ll never hear that from the MSM that promoted the nonsense the whole way through. It might be tough to accept, but the fact is that you’ve been misled about the whole thing.
Yes everything normal people would believe is bullshit isn't it. Everyone is out to get you. Everything is a conspiracy. Any data collected by the Government is fabricated. It's all lies. [sarcasm]

I'm not sure why I even bother arguing with people like you - I know full well it's a waste of breath. However at least someone has to say something sane.
 
Yes everything normal people would believe is bullshit isn't it. Everyone is out to get you. Everything is a conspiracy. Any data collected by the Government is fabricated. It's all lies. [sarcasm]

I'm not sure why I even bother arguing with people like you - I know full well it's a waste of breath. However at least someone has to say something sane.
What do you mean “Normal people?” Seems like you’re in a minority on most of your views here in OTC anyways. If all your going by is what the news says as “Normal” you might end up being surprised as to who actually believes what.

Furthermore, you’re mischaracterizing and mocking my analytical approach, which isn’t based on “who” is saying anything, but rather “what’s” being said and whether it’s supported or not. It seems like you and many others are not able to independently evaluate information and instead learned to try to figure out “who” is the most credible and just go with whatever they say. That’s why you’re apparently so concerned with “Normal” or what the mainstream news says. Well, I’m sorry to report that these trusted organizations and institutions are dinosaurs and are on the way out.
 
What do you mean “Normal people?” Seems like you’re in a minority on most of your views here in OTC anyways. If all your going by is what the news says as “Normal” you might end up being surprised as to who actually believes what.

Furthermore, you’re mischaracterizing and mocking my analytical approach, which isn’t based on “who” is saying anything, but rather “what’s” being said and whether it’s supported or not. It seems like you and many others are not able to independently evaluate information and instead learned to try to figure out “who” is the most credible and just go with whatever they say. That’s why you’re apparently so concerned with “Normal” or what the mainstream news says. Well, I’m sorry to report that these trusted organizations and institutions are dinosaurs and are on the way out.
Sorry mate... Studies have shown that people that believe in conspiracy theories are quite the opposite - they lack analytical thinking. I used to write systems for a living. You have to be very logical and analytical to do that. You have to be able to break down everything into logical steps.

Conspiracy Beliefs vs. Critical and Analytical Thinking | Psychology Today Australia
 
Analytical thinking actually reduces belief in conspiracy theories - so sorry mate. Also I used to write systems for a living so you have to be very logical.

Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories - ScienceDirect
That looks like a fun article to tear apart, but even the term “Conspiracy theory” demonstrates a lack of thinking. What, are we to believe that people in power are incapable of conspiring? And theorizing about such conspiracy is somehow not analytical? Isn’t that what court prosecutors do for a living? Give me a break. The term is meant (Somehow) as a pejorative, but all it’s designed to do is deflect attention from criminal accountability of those in power.
 
Back
Top