BEWARE OF THIS SELLER...

[NewWorldMan]

Auction is misleading..it clearly says the unit has a 105PT and it seems not to be the case.

Umm...no, it has a 105 PT in it.

 

[AmpliFIRE]

11. Logic

Bingo...it seems as though there is definitely some logic missing here

 

[druckpig]

Thats not answering the question is it, was the amp converted from simul to 60/100

Again, it doesn't matter.

But dude, this is wear you make yourself appear a bit, well, less than forthcoming. It's a simple question with a Yes or No answer.

Its simple he didnt mention it in the ebay auction listing because it wasnt in his interest to do so, originality or even the slightest hint of the lack of originality will affect the final price of the amp

and he didnt want to answer it here as admitting the ot is a replacement as it is clearly not mentioned in the listing , twisting and turning like a twisty turny thing....

 

[tweed]

You really are a moron Jack. We will meet soon...

Screen shot taken. If I hear one more word about us "meeting," I will be contacting the Orlando PD and have them talk to Brenda, the true purchaser of the amp.

Pics of Brenda or she's a blowup doll.

 

[AmpliFIRE]

You really are a moron Jack. We will meet soon...

Screen shot taken. If I hear one more word about us "meeting," I will be contacting the Orlando PD and have them talk to Brenda, the true purchaser of the amp.

Pics of Brenda or she's a blowup doll.

 

[rupe]

Lots of people try to emulate or build amps but it rarerly gets to the Cameron/Bogner/Mesa Mark II C+ level of awesomeness.

Wow, including Cameron Amplification with Bogner and Mesa is a bit of a reach, don't you think??? I could come up with quite a few examples that would have been more appropriate

 

[NewWorldMan]

Mesa didn't start using this OT until the release of the Mark III amp. He knew it - and said nothing about it.

https://soundclick.com/share?songid=8335156

"The 562100 was used on...Mark IIC+'s, Mark III's..." and followed up by "...that's the proper transformer for the amp."

 

[druckpig]

Mesa didn't start using this OT until the release of the Mark III amp. He knew it - and said nothing about it.

https://soundclick.com/share?songid=8335156

"The 562100 was used on...Mark IIC+'s, Mark III's..." and followed up by "...that's the proper transformer for the amp."

the 562100 was also used right up to 1998 on mkIII amp and on later rectifier amps so is the ot from 1985 or 1995 ? or 2005?

 

[Gainzilla]

I cant be bothered to read through the whole thing so someone please sum it up for me and tell me who the Douche is; NewWorldMan or TheGaindeli?

 

[NewWorldMan]

the 562100 was also used right up to 1998 on mkIII amp and on later rectifier amps so is the ot from 1985 or 1995 ? or 2005?

By asking this question, you're displaying your lack of knowledge. It's an '85, same as the new PCB.

 

[tweed]

Could you panzies step it up a bit? I would like to see this thread implode before my lunchbreak.

 

[druckpig]

the 562100 was also used right up to 1998 on mkIII amp and on later rectifier amps so is the ot from 1985 or 1995 ? or 2005?

By asking this question, you're displaying your lack of knowledge. It's an '85, same as the new PCB.

yeah ? well as a result not mentioning it in the listing and by acting like a devious little shit by being less than forthcoming and refusing to answer when I repeatedly asked you was the ot a replacement, I couldnt give a flying fuck as to what your opinion is of my KNOWLEDGE

you didnt mention it because it wasnt in your interest to do so, MEET ME MEET ME, OOOOH
GO PHONE THE ORLANDO PD.... you pansy arse little wimp

you tried to pull a fast one in your auction and now you have been shown up for what you really are your spinning like a fucking racehorse on crack....

 

[rupe]

The auction clearly states that it is a converted IIC to a IIC+. Would that conversion require a transformer change? If so, there should be no issue. If not, the item description was less than forthcoming.

 

[DaveP]

Looks like TGD found himself an attorney that speaks his language.

 

[druckpig]

The auction clearly states that it is a converted IIC to a IIC+. Would that conversion require a transformer change? If so, there should be no issue. If not, the item
description was less than forthcoming.

No IIc conversion to IIc+ definitely doesent require a transformer change....

but there was a transformer change and on a $2400 vintage amp it is definitely an issue and should of been mentioned and wasnt..

 

[DaveP]

And your an asshole.