glpg80":16jl3a37 said:
With a commercial/business license and business ID, Intellectual property rights have to be followed. Joe Shmoe in his/her basement can’t claim it as it has to be for commercial basis only from what I understand. IP is something that as an engineer I have to protect within my employer and externally as well. Stolen IP is grounds for a lawsuit and punishment if you’re infringements warrant review by the IP owner.
Of corse I do have all you've mentioned. Business license, business ID, Custom's ID, tax number, permission of the government to hand or industrial build & sell electronic gear, since I don't have a high school degree as an EE - what else is required?
glpg80":16jl3a37 said:
Sounds like Larry isn’t going to persue a lawsuit so why stir the pot? Put your money where your mouth is otherwise you too can be sued for defamation.
You're definitely mistaken
CNutz":16jl3a37 said:
Go get em Larry
What I've definitely decided now.
Just got off the phone with that attorney and it looks very very successfully for me with sueing MF
He once again confirmed, that a patent or only a pending patent isn't required, since IP is protected by law.
We spoke about the proofs I already have and he confirmed, that the amps in real aren't required, if the photos are detailled enough - and they are
And...
... he still has had a terrific idea, or rather suggestion:
If there are some more amp or pedal builder around, who feel ripped of MF and who do have enough proof, then they can jump onto the same train against MF
If then we'd go side by side against MF, this would save some costs (if there's a risk at all) for each AND would increase the burdon of proof agains MF
Hello out there - is there someone, who also has been ripped of his IP and who has the balls, to step in for a collective lawsuit?
If so, then please email me.