Proof the Earth is round

  • Thread starter Thread starter 311splawndude
  • Start date Start date
You make good arguments @acceptance. The answer to your question is...yes.

I trust the thousands of observations made going back to Aristotle (google says 384-822 B.C.). If someone gave me concrete evidence that the earth was flat I guess I'd look at it but the evidence otherwise is overwhelming. Just watching Jupiter's moons circle around is enough for me practically. :dunno:

If all the governments of the world (including Russian and China) were trying to trick 8 billion people then why would they spend so much time and money sending probes, satellites, spaceships, humans, and telescope up into space/the heavens?

And if they were, then why? What would be gained?

And if something were to be gained, at what cost? Was all the fakery really worth it. How do you get that many people in cahoots? Most of these thousands of people that are 'in on it' don't even know each other and don't speak the same languages.
Fair enough. I'm not trying to convince anyone btw. And I agree with Von, even though I'm not Christian, that it is a mystery. That is I don't think the people who we think know actually don't know either. It's interesting that a believer and non-believer have come to a similar view on this.

The best evidence I can give you is your own senses. You can't see any curvature and you can't feel any spinning. You can't find curved water. You can't see or detect gravity. In other words, there is nothing about the world we live in that your senses would lead you to believe that we live on a spinning ball. But humans have been observing the bodies in the sky and theorizing about what they are and why they act as they do for all of history, which have given rise to the ball earth idea, among others. In other words, it is an entirely intellectual endeavor. But you take this for granted because you have seen pictures and the people that you have trusted tell you it is so.

Why? As I said, for money and power, like every deception. And to break your confidence in yourself. Von can tell you more about this, but there are ways that people can be psychologically groomed to just listen and obey, and I think this is one of them.

I keep saying, only very few people in high levels need to be in cahoots. And still tons of evidence slips through, but people ignore it or waive it away. Greenrooms, missing rocks, inconsistent testimony and so on. And I don't think different countries need to be in on anything together, they just need to get the idea and run with it. Everything else comes naturally for those with a desire to prey on fellow man.
 
Last edited:
People that are in space circumnavigate the globe several times a day. Seeing the curve is no big deal when you literally travel around the planet

Eclipses cannot be easily explained by any other means. I’m sure people can come up with one off explanations about events on the planet, but they only account for the single event, they are never all encompassing or as mind bogglingly simple as the earth simply being round
Simply predicting them would be impossible. Or predicting Halley's Comet. No fucking way we could know that shit without a basic understanding of space.


I'm shocked this argument is still going on here.
 
@VonBonfire - yeah I saw Karen with the greenscreen trick. So what? I'm not saying that nothing ever gets greenscreened or faked. I'm sure it does. But if you sat down with Karen at lunch, I'm sure she would fill your brain with amazing stories about her adventures in outerspace.


A person who lies once is called what? A person who deceives others is called what?

I wouldn't believe a doggone thing that came out of her mouth unless she spat teeth. :LOL:
 
Simply predicting them would be impossible. Or predicting Halley's Comet. No fucking way we could know that shit without a basic understanding of space.


I'm shocked this argument is still going on here.
That's not true. People have been making these predictions — including eclipses — forever (Saros cycle). And they used it to make others believe they had special powers even, basically just like today.
 
That's not true. People have been making these predictions — including eclipses — forever. And they used it to make others believe they had special powers even, basically just like today.

But no one is trying to pass them off as super powers today. People are willing to teach anyone who wants to learn about it; and instead others will shit on them for it
 
That's not true. People have been making these predictions — including eclipses — forever (Saros cycle). And they used it to make others believe they had special powers even, basically just like today.
Yes, the latest special power is selling disposable shades and hotel rooms to people who chase signs in the sky. Pretty much the mark of a paganized people.
 
That's not true. People have been making these predictions — including eclipses — forever (Saros cycle). And they used it to make others believe they had special powers even, basically just like today.
Yes but that was based on periodicity not on an understanding of celestial mechanics.

There is no argument going on here like there are two equally plausible scenarios and it's on equal footing. One is a wacko conspiracy theory the other is reality with so much evidence in this modern age that I shake my head that there are wackos who believe this stuff. The US education system is obviously a fucking shambles for people like this to even exist.
 
I wonder how many science lovers chastise ball earth disbelievers and then sit down and read their horoscopes hoping to improve their love life?

LOL
Astrology is pseudo science. Any scientist these days would tell you that.
 
We all identify as Ophiuchus
I am actually an Ophiuchan according to my date of birth. I use that to shove it up wacko astrologers who I hold in contempt like flat earthers lol

For those who wonder what that means there is a 13th constellation that crosses the ecliptic (the path of the sun through the constellations over the course of a year) which defines what an astrologer would say is a zodiacal constellation however they say there are only 12 of course. Also, the zodiacal constellations precess over the centuries and millennia so the dates they say correspond to each zodiacal constellation have shifted since they were invented. As for predicting your fortune using the stars - what a total crock of shit that is.
 
Last edited:
As for predicting your fortune using the stars - what a total crock of shit that is.
It's enslavement. All of sudden you think you can only be in relationships with "compatible signs". There are a ton of people boxed in by the shit at the back of the newspaper and that's just touching the surface of it. I think all those astrologers, palmists, fortune tellers, etc should do jail time for running scams.
 
It's enslavement. All of sudden you think you can only be in relationships with "compatible signs". There are a ton of people boxed in by the shit at the back of the newspaper and that's just touching the surface of it. I think all those astrologers, palmists, fortune tellers, etc should do jail time for running scams.
Well yeah sure,... but the flat earth stuff is almost just as bad.
 
That's not true. People have been making these predictions — including eclipses — forever (Saros cycle). And they used it to make others believe they had special powers even, basically just like today.
That's my point. With a simple telescope and basic understanding of space and orbits and gravity these things can be predicted. They knew that shit in the 1500s.
 
That's my point. With a simple telescope and basic understanding of space and orbits and gravity these things can be predicted. They knew that shit in the 1500s.
Yes predicted and using the algorithms you can program planetarium software using their orbital data etc. I have a book that I've used to contribute some of my computer programming to some Digital setting circles (product is called an Argo Navis digital setting circle) - that guides your telescope and tracks objects.

https://www.wildcard-innovations.com.au/
 
Yes but that was based on periodicity not on an understanding of celestial mechanics.

There is no argument going on here like there are two equally plausible scenarios and it's on equal footing. One is a wacko conspiracy theory the other is reality with so much evidence in this modern age that I shake my head that there are wackos who believe this stuff. The US education system is obviously a fucking shambles for people like this to even exist.
The ancients had stories that explained "celestial mechanics" as well. The modern man is conceited in that he considers himself beyond the errors of the past generations because he has an iphone and nuclear bomb. ...So what is your best evidence? The direction of the stars in each hemisphere? What? Rembember, can't use NASA pics.
 
Back
Top