Proof the Earth is round

  • Thread starter Thread starter 311splawndude
  • Start date Start date
Like you and microwaves?
theoffice-stanley.gif
 
My "views" are we don't know what the true shape is. It's meant to be a mystery. Hence, we live a in a realm.

If it's a ball, and one side is lit up all the time during daylight hours, where is my full color, ball earth in totality, non-composite picture? I mean, they only been up there how many decades supposedly? You'd think there would be literally thousands upon thousands of very high resolution single image photos available yet you are struggling to find even one. Because it's bullshit my brother.

This took a 5 second search. Only the 2002 image is composite. The other 3 are single image.

1727993238301.png
 
Where's Yung Bonfire acccusing everyone of meal time?? The only possibility...he is eating a meal!
 
So you infer from these observations that we live on a spinning ball but disregard direct observation that counters that it's flat?
Except it's not flat. Any spherical object with sufficient radius will appear flat from its surface from a human perspective. You have a tiny mind if you can't work that out. Even the wall in the hall of my house isn't perfectly flat thanks to my framers but it appears flat.
 
Except it's not flat. Any spherical object with sufficient radius will appear flat. You have a tiny mind if you can't work that out. Even the wall in the hall of my house isn't perfectly flat thanks to my framers but it appears flat.
No I get it. ...And there's ALWAYS an explanation.
 
They're all like the same size and resolution from vastly different distances. And they all look different too. I wonder if the DSCOVR satellite took any spinning earth video? :unsure:
Scaling of the image, different camera used. Not that difficult to understand.
 
Oh but for them it is.
Again, I get it. But if you've ever worked with digitized images and scaling you'd know that resolution is affected. You guys are easily convinced is all I can say. In this case each image, though scaled the same looks like a different object altogether. And does anyone really believe we have a camara and satellite that can take a picture and send it from a million miles away?
 
Again, I get it. But if you've ever worked with digitized images and scaling you'd know that resolution is affected. You guys are easily convinced is all I can say.
The default position is not some fruitcake conspiracy. I don't have to prove anything. If you believe the absurd it just makes you gullible, stupid or insane. Take your pick - it has to be one of them.
 
The default position is not some fruitcake conspiracy. I don't have to prove anything. If you believe the absurd it just makes you gullible, stupid or insane. Take your pick - it has to be one of them.
You know how closeted homosexuals have a tendency to call others gay? :unsure:
 
Care to explain how a fisheye lens would put an icewall circling a pancake Earth (Flat Earth's version of Antarctica) into a single pole at one end of a sphere? idiot.
That's a picture taken of the sky using a fisheye lens. WTH are you talking about short stack?
 
You guys are easily convinced is all I can say.

If you can offer evidence that cane be validated and hold up against scrutiny that suggests any other shape of the earth I'll be open to it. So far I haven't seen anything that could not be debunked. Until then I'll accept the mounds of validated evidence of a sphere.
 
 
Back
Top