Proof the Earth is round

  • Thread starter Thread starter 311splawndude
  • Start date Start date
MadAsAHatter said:
If you can offer evidence that cane be validated and hold up against scrutiny that suggests any other shape of the earth I'll be open to it. So far I haven't seen anything that could not be debunked. Until then I'll accept the mounds of validated evidence of a sphere.
Click to expand...
I don't see it as a binary -- one or the other. Like I said before I think there are good critiques from both sides and that is why it is troubling. I think that both views are inadequate.
 
Thumbpicker said:
window licker.
Click to expand...
This is the first thing that popped into my head reading window licker
1727995105546.png
 
acceptance said:
Again, I get it. But if you've ever worked with digitized images and scaling you'd know that resolution is affected. You guys are easily convinced is all I can say. In this case each image, though scaled the same looks like a different object altogether. And does anyone really believe we have a camara and satellite that can take a picture and send it from a million miles away?
Click to expand...

I’m pretty they send them with radio waves.
 
acceptance said:
I don't see it as a binary -- one or the other. Like I said before I think there are good critiques from both sides and that is why it is troubling. I think that both views are inadequate.
Click to expand...
The critiques are not even close.
 
VonBonfire said:
I see you are on your way to melting down......again.
Click to expand...
No - you just imagine I'm melting down in that deluded mind of yours. I don't give a toss. I'm not emotionally invested at all. I just think you're a spastic and aren't worth the breath because you can't argue with insanity.
 
Thumbpicker said:
No - you just imagine I'm melting down in that deluded mind of yours. I don't give a toss. I'm not emotionally invested at all. I just think you're a spastic and aren't worth the breath because you can't argue with insanity.
Click to expand...
You don't make reformers look reformed at all. Insults, cursing, over what?

Oh wait "I'm not getting involved in foolish controversies". Yet here you are again cause you can't keep your explosive hot tempered short man syndrome shit in check, at all, ever.
 
VonBonfire said:
You don't make reformers look reformed at all. Insults, cursing, over what?

Oh wait "I'm not getting involved in foolish controversies". Yet here you are again cause you can't keep your explosive hot tempered short man syndrome shit in check, at all, ever.
Click to expand...
It's not a controversy though. It's entirely uncontroversial.
 
Microwaves are radio waves.

So if you don't believe you can send a satellite photo. Why do you believe you can wirelessly send a document from your computer to a printer. Or stream television using wifi.
 
Thumbpicker said:
It's not a controversy though. It's entirely uncontroversial.
Click to expand...
Then why would you insult someone over a pretty minor online disagreement? You see to take dissent on the subject, and every other subject, badly. It's kind of your personality to be blowing your stack over stupid stuff all the time. You are not an even tempered man.
 
acceptance said:
Different frequencies mate. And despite what Dan says, they are unidirectional, not omnidirectional.
Click to expand...
It's all part of the electromagnetic spectrum.

You can send stuff to satellites from Earth though. For example, an epirb. Also satellite internet - despite the latency.
 
acceptance said:
Different frequencies mate. And despite what Dan says, they are unidirectional, not omnidirectional.
Click to expand...

I said I don’t know a lot about microwaves so chose not to discuss them. You should take notice
 
acceptance said:
I'd love to see a video of a real life spinning earth ball.

The radio transmission towers are line-of-sight — that is they have to have a direct path from one to the other. The radio waves don't curve. This is similar to 5g tech.
Click to expand...
I would too.

As far as that microwave transmission, I know a little bit about it but not an expert. I've contracted for some PTP wireless, fixed wireless, satellite and microwave transmission for data networks. Microwaves, from what I know, have a fairly large wave form and perfect for propagation over land and sea as well as obstacles (vs PTP or 802.11). The microwave towers in the example were not at sea level. The provider of the service is admitting that the towers were 2,000 ft high. I had to research this, this was not at the tip of my tongue.

hs6vTpY.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
 
Back
Top