This is extremely obviously not the case.
I'm not confident in that at all and I don't know how you could possibly be confident in that. Gut feeling based on your own biases ? You didn't know Jesus and there really is no indication anywhere of how he felt about such matters. It's like me saying that Socrates was most likely addicted to masturbating with a rope tied around his neck. There's simply nothing there other than random conjecture from someone with zero inside knowledge.
Because the ancient hebrews did not believe in a spinning ball. They just didn't. In fact, contrary to @MadAsAHatter s claims, the idea that we live on a spinning ball was a novelty in the ancient world.
You've been provided with sources several times throughout this thread which you dismissed with no consideration to their validity. I'm not doing the work for you this time. Besides a simple search will yield results.
It is absolutely your position. An example is you have stated that you don't see a curve in the horizon therefore it is flat; i.e. the curve doesn't exist. A second example; many times you implied gravity doesn't exist because you couldn't "feel" it. Again flawed logic of I can't detect it so it doesn't exist.
Which can be validated through physics, physiology, mathematics, and experimentation. I'll give you this simplistic video that explains it; though you'll likely dismiss it as per usual.
You're more than welcome to replicate any of the experiments, work through mathematical formulas, and trust your results enough to present them for peer evaluation. What's stopping you?
So what happened to " Jesus would presumably know".
As I said to acceptance, You're more than welcome to replicate any of the experiments, work through mathematical formulas, and trust your results enough to present them for peer evaluation. What's stopping you?
Please prove me wrong. give me that history lesson I asked for.
It's irrelevant to me. Utterly meaningless. When I google "flat earth" and all I get is stuff attempting to debunk it it's the equivalent of looking up something a conservative said and reading a democrat party fact check as to whether it's true or not. They are attempting to maintain control of a narrative that they no longer are the sole possessor of.
Exaaaaactly.
But I am not arguing that these points make it impossible that the earth is a spinning ball. I am arguing that they are evidence against it being a spinning ball.
You have what is almost verging on a non-falsifiable theory, given that direct observation is dismissed as mirage, curves are too large to measure, altitudes too high to attain, invisible forces unable to be directly detected...
I'm spit ballin' 
It's not much harder to believe than it is to buy into the idea we are on a rapidly spinning ball, all of us kept from flying off by some mystical, unidentifiable force called "gravity".
Yes, exactly. If you don't trust the source do your own work, nothing's stopping you.
Irrelevant what point you're arguing, you're using flawed logic to do it.
Science only offers theories and models on the subject, not certitudes. Because of our limited perspective as humans it's an unknown, hence the church's official stance.