Proof the Earth is round

No to mention this is the flat earth thread and you haven't even begun to substantiate that the bible say's it's a spinning ball. How about that Joshua passage? Did God "understand" what Joshua meant when he commanded the sun to be still for a day? Why didn't he correct him: "Joshua you fool, the earth is a spinning ball that is rotating around the sun which I have made the center of the solar system because I am a sun god!"
 
MontiCristo said:
I just think it's shameful for someone like you to be in support of a satanist. You're an embarrassment.
Click to expand...
As the thread progressed and you weren't able to support your arguments you've been reduced to insulting anyone who disagrees with you. "Fool" "idiot" "embarrassment" "delusional". Then you apologized, I forgave you, and then you continued with the insults when you still couldn't get a leg up. You're still forgiven because you've been misled by other bad theologians so it's understandable. But you're totally misguided.

I pretty much rested my case right here, post 1765 which makes it real clear how far off base your goofy brand of protestantism is. The quote is from YOUR preferred legacy bible btw.

VonBonfire said:
Matthew 26:27

And when He had taken a cup and given thanks, He gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you;

Pick one that best matches the above bible verse:

View attachment 359516



View attachment 359519
Click to expand...
 
VonBonfire said:
As the thread progressed and you weren't able to support your arguments you've been reduced to insulting anyone who disagrees with you. "Fool" "idiot" "embarrassment" "delusional". Then you apologized, I forgave you, and then you continued with the insults when you still couldn't get a leg up. You're still forgiven because you've been misled by other bad theologians so it's understandable. But you're totally misguided.

I pretty much rested my case right here, post 1765 which makes it real clear how far off base your goofy brand of protestantism is. The quote is from YOUR preferred legacy bible btw.
Click to expand...
I don't understand the point you are attempting to make with that quote.
How does that text disprove Protestantism? It may be helpful if you formulate an argument from something other than emotions.
There haven't been any insults, so I again don't know what you are talking about. Your disdain for my position matches my disdain for yours.
Only one of us Hates the word of God and does not submit to it's authority.
Only one of us has been in support of a publicly, self proclaimed "luciferian".
It's shameful. You should be ashamed.

Tell your little buddy he is wasting his time asking me direct questions. I refuse to speak to someone who supports satanism and seeks to do nothing but twist and malign the word of God.
 
MontiCristo said:
How does that text disprove Protestantism?
Click to expand...
Because it says "it" in the singular, not the plural. There is one cup of Christ, not two hundred little disposable plastic cups. So for all your bluster of "nOt fOunD iN sCrIpTuRe" you seem to miss the most obvious, and apparent, theological problems with your big claims. You deny it is the genuine body and blood, and say it's all symbolic. I offered both scripture AND writings from the early church fathers to confirm that your view there is wrong also, so all you can do is pull the same old satanic accusations of "you hang out with sinners" . You accused me of cannibalism, the same thing your roman pagan forefathers accused the early christians of.

MontiCristo said:
I refuse to speak to someone who supports satanism and seeks to do nothing but twist and malign the word of God.
Click to expand...
You were too busy tooting your own protestant horn to even ask him what he believed.
 
VonBonfire said:
Because it says "it" in the singular, not the plural. There is one cup of Christ, not two hundred little disposable plastic cups. So for all your bluster of "nOt fOunD iN sCrIpTuRe" you seem to miss the most obvious, and apparent, theological problems with your big claims. You deny it is the genuine body and blood, and say it's all symbolic. I offered both scripture AND writings from the early church fathers to confirm that your view there is wrong also, so all you can do is pull the same old satanic accusations of "you hang out with sinners" . You accused me of cannibalism, the same thing your roman pagan forefathers accused the early christians of.


You were too busy tooting your own protestant horn to even ask him what he believed.
Click to expand...
so at your Church ya'll must be drinking out of the actual Holy Grail then right?
 
For everyone else who isn't living in "neverland", has some level of brain capacity and can actually read.
The "cup described" during the Lord's supper is no different than the one reference by Christ here in Luke 22:42 (below)
It symbolically represents His suffering.

Jesus wasn't asking The Father to take a literal cup from Him.
anyone thinking along those lines needs to see a psychiatrist.

'saying, “Father, if You are willing, remove this cup from Me, yet not My will, but Yours be done.” '

Luke 22:42
https://www.bible.com/bible/3345/LUK.22.42
 
MontiCristo said:
so at your Church ya'll must be drinking out of the actual Holy Grail then right?
Click to expand...
I'm pleased to say I don't know what they're saying but I have already told him Jesus would be really pleased if he knew they all ate out of an adorned golden cup [sarcasm] - because the trappings of wealth and bling meant so much to him [sarcasm]
 
MontiCristo said:
For everyone else who isn't living in "neverland", has some level of brain capacity and can actually read.
The "cup described" during the Lord's supper is no different than the one reference by Christ here in Luke 22:42 (below)
It symbolically represents His suffering.

Jesus wasn't asking The Father to take a literal cup from Him.
anyone thinking along those lines needs to see a psychiatrist.

'saying, “Father, if You are willing, remove this cup from Me, yet not My will, but Yours be done.” '

Luke 22:42
https://www.bible.com/bible/3345/LUK.22.42
Click to expand...
Exactly!

Everything Jesus said was literal [again sarcasm]
 
VonBonfire said:
Because it says "it" in the singular, not the plural. There is one cup of Christ, not two hundred little disposable plastic cups. So for all your bluster of "nOt fOunD iN sCrIpTuRe" you seem to miss the most obvious, and apparent, theological problems with your big claims. You deny it is the genuine body and blood, and say it's all symbolic. I offered both scripture AND writings from the early church fathers to confirm that your view there is wrong also, so all you can do is pull the same old satanic accusations of "you hang out with sinners" . You accused me of cannibalism, the same thing your roman pagan forefathers accused the early christians of.


You were too busy tooting your own protestant horn to even ask him what he believed.
Click to expand...
uh, yea it's not a literal cup. Anyone with a brain can see that.
'saying, “Father, if You are willing, remove this cup from Me, yet not My will, but Yours be done.” '

Luke 22:42
https://www.bible.com/bible/3345/LUK.22.42

not going to apologize for saying it's cannibalistic to imply eating actual flesh and blood is what is portrayed by Jesus when referencing the "cup of His suffering" - because it is. Cannibalistic.

and your partner was asked very plainly what he believed and said he was a luciferin.
your defense of Him speaks volumes about your real standing before the Lord
You are weak and ineffectual and you support demons.

Shame on you.
 
I'm going to throw this back to @VonBonfire in his face.

He criticised protestantism for making everyone able to read and interpret the Bible for him/herself.

Well it's got to be a darn sight more preferable than a bunch of priests and elders that corrupted the Bible and made their own religion that has nothing to do with the Bible at all.
 
Thumbpicker said:
I'm pleased to say I don't know what they're saying but I have already told him Jesus would be really pleased if he knew they all ate out of an adorned golden cup [sarcasm] - because the trappings of wealth and bling meant so much to him [sarcasm]
Click to expand...
he's implying there is only one cup because He's a pharisee and has not the brain capacity to understand that this "cup" is a reference to Christ's suffering.

It's border line metal hospital stuff man.
 
Thumbpicker said:
I'm going to throw this back to @VonBonfire in his face.

He criticised protestantism for making everyone able to read and interpret the Bible for him/herself.

Well it's got to be a darn site more preferable than a bunch of priests and elders that corrupted the Bible and made their own religion that has nothing to do with the Bible at all.
Click to expand...
exactly why He believe Christ's "cup" is a literal actual cup and not the passion.

The Bible is the word of Jesus.
Jesus says He is the truth, the way and the life
Jesus says His word is all authoritative.
any man that implies an institution has more authority over Jesus is not a believer and should be ignored.
 
MontiCristo said:
he's implying there is only one cup because He's a pharisee and has not the brain capacity to understand that this "cup" is a reference to Christ's suffering.

It's border line metal hospital stuff man.
Click to expand...
He is denying the obvious because he made the decision to go Orthodox and he is too proud to step back from it.
 
Thumbpicker said:
He is denying the obvious because he made the decision to go Orthodox and he is too proud to step back from it.
Click to expand...
dude needs psychiatric help if He thinks Jesus was referring to an actual cup.
btw there is an ignore button you can use on acceptance. Just figured that out. works great.
 
This is to any Orthodox person who claims Protestantism is wrong because only Priests and Elders should interpret the Bible.

Philippians 2:12-13​

​

12 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, 13 for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.


In the Catholic Church the Priests and Elders used to conduct mass in Latin for centuries - just to keep the parishioners ignorant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top