Picasso
Well-known member
Sums it up perfectly.Matthew 7:5
Hypocrite. First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
Sums it up perfectly.Matthew 7:5
Hypocrite. First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
I'm not going anywhere. I can debate without resorting to sexual insults. Can you? We'll see.Indeed, You won’t be missed.
I'll repeat what I said already for your edification. I can debate without resorting to sexually based insults and threats, lies, fake victimization claims, etc.Great.....so when are YOU leaving as you're possibly the least liked person on this forum?
https://www.rig-talk.com/forum/threads/fucked-around-and-found-out.274942/post-3386116I'll repeat what I said already for your edification. I can debate without resorting to sexually based insults and threats, lies, fake victimization claims, etc.
Can you? We'll see.
… the DB Troll Farm got a firm slap on the wristwhat did I miss? lol.....
He's not here now.One formerly banned member, “one”, causes ALL the problems. Not just this forum either. Remember that.
Thread Title: “PSA - The Constant Ad-hominem Attacks & Accusations of a Sexual Nature End Now”.… I can debate without resorting to sexual insults...
Yes….it’s very offensive….jkMust I change my name?
A few people are going hoist they’re own petards!Thread Title: “PSA - The Constant Ad-hominem Attacks & Accusations of a Sexual Nature End Now”.
Note the “&”. As in “and”. So it is the “the accussations of a sexual nature” AND “the constant ad hominem attacks”. Two separate behaviors not one.
We will see.
Carry on.
Thou be smitten as Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.A few people are going hoist they’re own petards!
~ss
One behaviour:Thread Title: “PSA - The Constant Ad-hominem Attacks & Accusations of a Sexual Nature End Now”.
Note the “&”. As in “and”. So it is the “the accussations of a sexual nature” AND “the constant ad hominem attacks”. Two separate behaviors not one.
Attacks on each other you mean not articles that discuss child sex trafficking etc..Well, I expected this:
I received an immediate accusation via PM of bias 'cause I "warned" Picasso yesterday instead of banning him.
Wake up peeps and use some logic FFS. People aren't robots; they can't flick a switch and change their behaviour 100%, without error, in every case.
Always anticipated a short transition period, hence my request, stated twice, for the community to help facilitate this. No need to get snarky; just point aberrations out to the members involved to jog their memories and get them back-on-track.
We can make this work.
One behaviour:
1 thing:
"Ad-hominem Attacks & Accusations..."
Descriptor:
"... of a Sexual Nature"
The "accusations" fall under the "ad-hominem" banner.
The new rule, as I pointed out in the OP, is in the OP of the OTC Rebooted sticky. It reads thusly - nice-and-succinct:
As of 2023-07-12 members will be punished for ad-hominem attacks of a sexual or overly-abusive nature.
HTH
Butt out lamebrain. He’s joking. Jesus Fingerbanging Christ you’re dumb.Spiritual healing tracks LOL. Look at his user name , you think he's into spiritual healing ?