CNutz":wgpre7ys said:
But now I know it's the bite & punch circuit he ripped from you.
Ok here we go and I've been thinking about posting the following at all a few days, but the world needs the truth and lies do have short legs, as we all already know.
No it's not ONLY the Bite & Punch circuit what he ripped off of my intellectual properties.
'Only this' maybe I even could have forgiven him?
But it's much more, way much more what he's ripped off of my circuits.
To be finally concrete in this manner...
...
the circuit of his NATAS is a 100% rip off of the DINO 939 I've built for him back in 2007
He's stripped down the DINO to the California & Scream channels, has omitted the British channel, has 'economized' the SRV mode of the California channel and has merely added a Send Level control to the FX loop section - and already he's been done. Nothing - in words:
NOTHING - of his NATAS circuit has emanated off his own brain.
The only what he's done different in the circuit is, that he's swapped a few part's values.
But the funny thing is, that I've especially after his demands at that time back in 2007 have choosen some part's values slightly different from those, which I usually use by building my DINO amps. And he has adopted these few unusual part's values in his NATAS
By coincidence I've had a NATAS on my bench a while ago and the customer left me the amp for 2 days, so that I could do my analysis.
All what I've said above I can proof anytime, because I also took enough HiQ photos of the inside of the partially disassembled NATAS
I don't send these photos around as well as I don't forward the schematic of this NATAS, which I've drawn by myself...
... but everybody who is interested and wants to come by to my shop anytime can have a look onto this all.
Sure the NATAS by far doesn't reach the sound performance of a DINO and that's caused by several reasons:
- his circuit is on a PCB while the DINO's circuit is on an eyelet board
- it's a different arrangement of the components on the DINO's board with wider spaces between them
- he's using different component's brands in respect to the DINO
- his lead dress, the routing of the cables is way different to the lead dress inside the DINO
- it's obvious to me, that he can't have much experience with that form of current, which isn't floating inside of components & cables
- he doesn't use NOS preamp & poweramp tubes
- and last but not least, his output transformer is in no way comparable to the DINO's output transformer
I guess (means, that I don't know definitely), that his Bones amp is nothing else than a stripped down DINO, remaining just the British channel
And moreover I guess, that his Evil Pumpkin isn't much other, than a revised NATAS
Once Joe Delaney of Randall named him "The Undisputed Master Of High Gain"
After knowing that all finally I only can name him "The Undisputed Master Of Plagiarism"
Have a nice Sunday, wherever you are!