Well thanks for nothing, this fucking sucks.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Digital Jams
  • Start date Start date
Telephant":2wdjnjnx said:
sah5150":2wdjnjnx said:
This was never a democracy. I don't understand why people behave like it is/was...

Steve

This confuses me because it seems everyone has forgot why this forum was created.. Because we were tired of the ridiculous moderation at HCAF and we wanted to go back to the old school HCAF ways of self moderation... You know, where forum members (not just admins) have a voice!!!!

Now when an admin reinstates a member known for spewing hate and at least 70% of the forum doesnt want him back.... And when that particular admin admits he's letting him back to stir shit up... Thats losing sight of why this forum was created IMO.

And then putting it on ebay because you cant take the heat.... :doh:
When was HC a forum where members had a voice?!?!?!
This place was created because HC was being over run my noobs and the whole dynamic over there changed. Or so I remember it.
 
JTyson":1hwar9wj said:
FUZZboat":1hwar9wj said:
so how does anyone make sure that this "carl" dude doesn't/isn't
bidding on the rig-talk auction just to drive up the price and queer the entire auction ??


Thanx for the good times everyone :rock:


to bad all Great things eventually come to an end (ie Benny Hill, John Candy and now Rig-Talk !!) :aww: :cry:
I dont think R-T is going anywhere - Jim

DITTO
 
bds9487":2djr5e66 said:
JTyson":2djr5e66 said:
Jellied eels :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared:
wrong_eels_ahero.jpg
Oh My God, that looks like upside-down, frozen to death, and then thawing baby turtles! I'm sorry, I just could not eat that, theres too much pizza left in the world :D - Jim
 
Zachman":34wjqs0x said:
Seems like you're taking the same approach, all be it a bit more subdued, that some of us took w/ Carl- BUT w/ me...

I find it odd that you'd choose to take a stand against me, yet NOT choose to take a stand FOR Ralph & Kage-- and AGAINST Carl.

Carl is now gone, and I for one am thrilled about that. I am happy to leave the discussion alone, yet reserve the right, to answer for my position, if/when asked about it- and hope that isn't going to be held against me, by those who didn't take a stand choosing instead to remain neutral. I suggest those in that catagory continue to practice what they preached, and move right along, if the discussion bothers you. ;)
Zach, it's far from slinging shit back and forth that you and Carl did what I see Steve doing. Why are you so hung up about this? Trust me, I've been i enough flame wars with Carl over the years. Even before HC, in the usenet days. I'm not sure why you'd think it prudent for some one to needle him when Chris' let him just so he'd go nuts to get banned.
I said this numerous times i this thread...Chris' and Bob's house...their rules. If you trying to get some one else banned by getting them to go nuts you're different how?
 
Telephant":2cdxon40 said:
Now when an admin reinstates a member known for spewing hate and at least 70% of the forum doesnt want him back.... And when that particular admin admits he's letting him back to stir shit up... Thats losing sight of why this forum was created IMO.

And then putting it on ebay because you cant take the heat.... :doh:

I'm not defending Carl in any way, shape or form but...

There's a difference between allowing Carl's presence to put a little pep into the forum and purposely wanting him to go into full blown meltdown and causing major upheaval imo.

I realize that's a minority opinion but it's a real fine line and Carl did start off (like so many other times before admittedly) posting on topic before he was cornered and the dark beast came out once again. :lol: :LOL:

Personally I don't mind either way, but I think there were some genuine good intentions with bringing him back. His dark side was forced out prematurely, yes it probably would have come out naturally at a later time but who knows how long he would have lasted. :)
 
degenaro":22zcjet7 said:
Zachman":22zcjet7 said:
Seems like you're taking the same approach, all be it a bit more subdued, that some of us took w/ Carl- BUT w/ me...

I find it odd that you'd choose to take a stand against me, yet NOT choose to take a stand FOR Ralph & Kage-- and AGAINST Carl.

Carl is now gone, and I for one am thrilled about that. I am happy to leave the discussion alone, yet reserve the right, to answer for my position, if/when asked about it- and hope that isn't going to be held against me, by those who didn't take a stand choosing instead to remain neutral. I suggest those in that catagory continue to practice what they preached, and move right along, if the discussion bothers you. ;)
Zach, it's far from slinging shit back and forth that you and Carl did what I see Steve doing. Why are you so hung up about this? Trust me, I've been i enough flame wars with Carl over the years. Even before HC, in the usenet days. I'm not sure why you'd think it prudent for some one to needle him when Chris' let him just so he'd go nuts to get banned.
I said this numerous times i this thread...Chris' and Bob's house...their rules. If you trying to get some one else banned by getting them to go nuts you're different how?

Clearly Ed, it's far from the slinging Carl and others, (including myself) engaged in...

I think prudence got left FAR behind when the decision to let Carl back here w/ the expressed goal of stirring things up. Wouldn't you agree?

I don't understand why Steve chose to single me out, when he certainly could've singled Carl out, and stood w/ guys who I thought were his friends ie Ralph, Kage & me.
 
Telephant":2wu0z7im said:
sah5150":2wu0z7im said:
This was never a democracy. I don't understand why people behave like it is/was...

Steve

This confuses me because it seems everyone has forgot why this forum was created.. Because we were tired of the ridiculous moderation at HCAF and we wanted to go back to the old school HCAF ways of self moderation... You know, where forum members (not just admins) have a voice!!!!

Now when an admin reinstates a member known for spewing hate and at least 70% of the forum doesnt want him back.... And when that particular admin admits he's letting him back to stir shit up... Thats losing sight of why this forum was created IMO.

And then putting it on ebay because you cant take the heat.... :doh:

By using the same logic, banning him in the first place was against the basic ideas that hte forum would self-moderate.

The problem stems more from people who have an OCD issue on having to one-up someone else, and can't let go of bullshit that someone typed out on the internet...and no, I'm not singling anyone out with that statement, we've all done it - we've all gotten hung up on trying to slam someone harder, and it just boils over.
 
Zachman":130fxpbg said:
Seems like you're taking the same approach, all be it a bit more subdued, that some of us took w/ Carl- BUT w/ me...
Are you out of your mind? I've made a couple of posts ribbing you about going on and on about this. It isn't even close to comparable to the constant baiting of Carl you were engaged in.

Zachman":130fxpbg said:
I find it odd that you'd choose to take a stand against me, yet NOT choose to take a stand FOR Ralph & Kage-- and AGAINST Carl.;)
Once again you are exaggerating this beyond belief. I'm not taking a stand against anyone. I was poking a bit of fun at you since you could not drop this issue. As far as taking a stand against Carl, that wasn't my place and I have no affect on the decision because this board is not a democracy and never was. What was I supposed to do? Engage in childish baiting games with Carl, hoping he would get banned. I'm sorry but that isn't my style.

Zachman":130fxpbg said:
Carl is now gone, and I for one am thrilled about that. I am happy to leave the discussion alone, yet reserve the right, to answer for my position, if/when asked about it- and hope that isn't going to be held against me, by those who didn't take a stand choosing instead to remain neutral. I suggest those in that catagory continue to practice what they preached, and move right along, if the discussion bothers you. ;)
Soon no one will care, so you won't be compelled to speak about it anyway.

Steve
 
Zachman":1uckj68h said:
I don't understand why Steve chose to single me out,
Too sensitive, dude - I ribbed you about continuing this discussion endlessly. C'mon - big deal... I chose to single you out because you are BY FAR the most active poster on this issue. Hell, this is the most you've posted here in forever, man. Let's talk gear...

Zachman":1uckj68h said:
when he certainly could've singled Carl out, and stood w/ guys who I thought were his friends ie Ralph, Kage & me.
Sigh.... I've already explained myself on this. As far as me supporting my friends - don't go there because you have no idea what you are talking about. I've had off forum discussions with both Kage and Ralph and they both know where I stand with them. And I think immature baiting of a guy in someone else's house is a fucked-up way to support your friends...

Steve
 
sah5150":2qetw6ow said:
Zachman":2qetw6ow said:
Seems like you're taking the same approach, all be it a bit more subdued, that some of us took w/ Carl- BUT w/ me...
Are you out of your mind? I've made a couple of posts ribbing you about going on and on about this. It isn't even close to comparable to the constant baiting of Carl you were engaged in.

Zachman":2qetw6ow said:
I find it odd that you'd choose to take a stand against me, yet NOT choose to take a stand FOR Ralph & Kage-- and AGAINST Carl.;)
Once again you are exaggerating this beyond belief. I'm not taking a stand against anyone. I was poking a bit of fun at you since you could not drop this issue. As far as taking a stand against Carl, that wasn't my place and I have no affect on the decision because this board is not a democracy and never was. What was I supposed to do? Engage in childish baiting games with Carl, hoping he would get banned. I'm sorry but that isn't my style.

Zachman":2qetw6ow said:
Carl is now gone, and I for one am thrilled about that. I am happy to leave the discussion alone, yet reserve the right, to answer for my position, if/when asked about it- and hope that isn't going to be held against me, by those who didn't take a stand choosing instead to remain neutral. I suggest those in that catagory continue to practice what they preached, and move right along, if the discussion bothers you. ;)
Soon no one will care, so you won't be compelled to speak about it anyway.

Steve

Okay... bygones... We're cool ;)
 
Zachman":114opmgh said:
sah5150":114opmgh said:
Zachman":114opmgh said:
Seems like you're taking the same approach, all be it a bit more subdued, that some of us took w/ Carl- BUT w/ me...
Are you out of your mind? I've made a couple of posts ribbing you about going on and on about this. It isn't even close to comparable to the constant baiting of Carl you were engaged in.

Zachman":114opmgh said:
I find it odd that you'd choose to take a stand against me, yet NOT choose to take a stand FOR Ralph & Kage-- and AGAINST Carl.;)
Once again you are exaggerating this beyond belief. I'm not taking a stand against anyone. I was poking a bit of fun at you since you could not drop this issue. As far as taking a stand against Carl, that wasn't my place and I have no affect on the decision because this board is not a democracy and never was. What was I supposed to do? Engage in childish baiting games with Carl, hoping he would get banned. I'm sorry but that isn't my style.

Zachman":114opmgh said:
Carl is now gone, and I for one am thrilled about that. I am happy to leave the discussion alone, yet reserve the right, to answer for my position, if/when asked about it- and hope that isn't going to be held against me, by those who didn't take a stand choosing instead to remain neutral. I suggest those in that catagory continue to practice what they preached, and move right along, if the discussion bothers you. ;)
Soon no one will care, so you won't be compelled to speak about it anyway.

Steve

Okay... bygones... We're cool ;)
Same here. Let's move on. Life is too short...

Steve
 
carlygtr56":bgtkypbp said:
Hey SPICtallica. Hacking into my MySpace? Pretty sad SPIC.

Your little SPIC WHORE wife and SPIClets suck my dick. That SPIC wife of yours looks like the SPIC whore who washed my ass with her lips.

FUCK YOU SPIC
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:



My work here is done. :rock:

LMAO :hys:

What a pathetic loser.

I didn't even have to forward the same PM he sent me this morning at 6am(loser) to Chris or Bob.
You outed yourself you fucking child!!! LOL

I also didn't have to hack his Myspace.
Carl is so fucking stupid that he didn't even notice I requested him as a friend on myspace yesterday evening and he accepted it. :lol: :LOL:

Hello ya think SLAY might be the same SLAY on Rig Talk. Dumb ass!

Poor sad little pathetic child.

Peace
the SPIC. LMAO Ouch that hurt so much :cry: :hys: :hys: :hys: :hys:
I mean Slay

Ohh and

BTW my crackhead whore wife and ugly spiclets say hi! :thumbsup:

SN8500462.jpg

l_b3d51188fe2cf1bf4d5c5870c1b9991f.jpg

MarkGlow.jpg

PDR_3720.jpg

Gloria6.jpg

LookingGood.jpg


Dream on bro!! Never in your pathic lonely life or the next would you have anything so beautiful love you.
 
Slay, you have a beautiful family man, but I'm not a big fan of posting pics of the family (at least the kids) on the net. Do as you please, but I usually suggest against it.
 
SgtThump":3mfukh83 said:
carlygtr56":3mfukh83 said:
Hey SPICtallica. Hacking into my MySpace? Pretty sad SPIC.

Your little SPIC WHORE wife and SPIClets suck my dick. That SPIC wife of yours looks like the SPIC whore who washed my ass with her lips.

FUCK YOU SPIC

See ya.

:lol: :LOL: :yes: :thumbsup:
 
Bob Savage":nqy25dhz said:
Slay, you have a beautiful family man, but I'm not a big fan of posting pics of the family (at least the kids) on the net. Do as you please, but I usually suggest against it.

Thanks Bob,

They're on my Myspace page so it's not like no one can't see em. I thank you for your concern though brother but it's all good :rock: . :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top