MadAsAHatter
Well-known member
You and fucking buttpicker making jokes about side dishes to have with pets and posting pictures of a pet in a hotdog costume is 100% you making light of pets being butchered and eaten. Disagree about what's actually happening, fine. But make light of a family member being killed is something only a sick & twisted trash person would do. And notice I said family member. Only the lowest of the low do not consider a beloved pet as a family member in some capacity. This is completely repulsive to me.
Last edited:
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
well that’s too bad
billsbigego
Well-known member
+1 for the brilliant government for letting in 1000's of people from a Voodoo culture.
MadAsAHatter
Well-known member
Extra credit for worthless people like Dan who make vile jokes about it. Mistreatment of animals and making light of situations such as this is a telltale sign of people who completely lack empathy and are psychopathic. It's only a small step away from moving on to people.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Yeah, you been here what, about a week ? From your first post it was obvious you’re a liberal. What is it with you fucking guys always pretending you’re not what you are ? Do you think it somehow gives you credibility to speak about politics because you claim to be neither left or right, but “centrist “ ? It doesn’t. Every political issue you come down on the left so quit lying. No one believes you.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Again proving you have no knowledge on the subject. Yet you continue speaking about it as if you are an authority.
When you guys who like to blame inanimate objects for violence instead of the people who commit it can figure out a way to keep that shit out of the hands of criminals, then you can talk about stripping citizens of the ability to defend themselves with equal footing. Until then who gives a fuck what you think is legal.
rsm
Well-known member
well, your shithole country is likely worse than ours. it's probably a place few outside of its' own citizens care about or know about.
I'm sure your countries problems are taking care of themselves, so you have time to care about what happens in the USA. you know if you care so much about the US, our border is wide open, just walk across, the border patrol whatever you like, then get free housing, food, medical, etc. compliments of the American taxpayer.
You'll probably like Portland or Seattle; but stop in LA and San Francisco on your way just to be sure.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Then you probably ought to shut the fuck up about US domestic politics. Where are you from ?
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
the person who asked me what I thought should be legal or not.
Which wasn’t you, yet here you are
rsm
Well-known member
reading with comprehension helps. just because you don't believe it doesn't make it false.
Jefferson received a letter from a friend who owned merchant ships that were being attacked by pirates; he asked Jefferson if the Constitution allowed him to arm his ships with the latest naval cannon to which Jefferson replied, yes that 2A is to ensure citizens have access to the same weapons available to the military. As one of the writers of the Constitution, who attended the meetings and votes on the Constitution and its' ratification, I think he knows more about the meaning, purpose and intent than most people alive today, including you.
deal with it.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Name another amendment or place in the constitution where it says “ The people” but it doesn’t actually mean the people. Name another amendment that is as concise and easy to understand as the second amendment. It was written specifically so people were not at the mercy of tyrants in government. There’s no other way to interpret the 2A that doesn’t require lying and/or disregarding the constitution. But, hey, Dan knows better than the guys who created this republic.
V
VonBonfire
Well-known member
If we don't allow everyone access to tech (or weapons) you just create a class of ubermensch who can control everything while everyone else suffers. Freedom entails risk. Safe societies mean a curtailment of freedoms. I would rather live in a risk/reward based society myself.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
Yet h
That has zero fucking meaning in this context. You overuse that phrase. Get some new material Dan.
Yet here I am ? lol.
That has zero fucking meaning in this context. You overuse that phrase. Get some new material Dan.
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Name another amendment or place in the constitution where it says “ The people” but it doesn’t actually mean the people. Name another amendment that is as concise and easy to understand as the second amendment. It was written specifically so people were not at the mercy of tyrants in government. There’s no other way to interpret the 2A that doesn’t require lying and/or disregarding the constitution. But, hey, Dan knows better than the guys who created this republic.
Easy tough guy. It’s too early for you to be getting worked up
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
In other words I have no argument so I’m just gonna say nope.
rsm
Well-known member
Massachusetts suits you; you're with others that deny and infringe on Constitutional rights whenever they can.
Floyd Eye
Well-known member
