Biden tests positive for COVID

Cool; thanks man. :LOL:


Hey, leave me out of it bro'; I don't do nuanced or constructive, and what's this newfangled "discussion" doowacky you speak of? :confused: :LOL:


That's intellectual speak for " You're the only guy here who simply states his opinion and nearly never disagrees with anyone".

Which to use Justin's analogy, is saying more about him than it is about everyone else. All of whom except you have found disagreeing with him the norm.
 
I don’t claim to be smart. I just choose to learn from smart people


iu
 
That's intellectual speak for " You're the only guy here who simply states his opinion and nearly never disagrees with anyone".

Which to use Justin's analogy, is saying more about him than it is about everyone else. All of whom except you have found disagreeing with him the norm.

I’m here on my own will so I’m not really talking shit, but this place is an interesting microcosm of the internet. Not even “this place”, just the core 20 posters or so in this section. it’s a place where science is leftist. It’s a place where I’m told I live in a fantasy world because I think some people voted for Biden because he wasn’t Trump.
That comment elicited the same reaction as someone else comparing Trump to Hitler lol. It’s massively skewed. Generally speaking, none of my “opinions” here are provocative. People did actually land on the moon. More than once in fact.
Greenhouse gases do actually warm the earth. No one outside of randos on the internet have disputed that.
Trump is in fact egotistical. It’s what I liked about him until he was the leader of the free world.
It’s not surprising the butthurt over the drag queen stuff, but as said you guys are so far skewed you can’t accept that someone else can have a “live and let live” attitude towards something that you hate so much, so it must be an agenda.
Anyways, I don’t deny my part in continuing the disagreements, but they only start because people love arguing with me. I typically don’t sling back the insults that are fired at me and I don’t go looking for fights, so you guys can either ignore me or except your fate for trying to disprove something that has already been proven to be correct by thousands of people before me.
 
Last edited:
I’m here on my own will so I’m not really talking shit, but this place is an interesting microcosm of the internet. Not even “this place”, just the core 20 posters or so in this section. it’s a place where science is leftist. It’s a place where I’m told I live in a fantasy world because I think some people voted for Biden because he wasn’t Trump.
That comment elicited the same reaction as someone else comparing Trump to Hitler lol. It’s massively skewed. Generally speaking, none of my “opinions” here are provocative. People did actually land on the moon. More than once in fact.
Greenhouse gases do actually warm the earth. No one outside of randos on the internet have disputed that.
Trump is in fact egotistical. It’s what I liked about him until he was the leader of the free world.
It’s not surprising the butthurt over the drag queen stuff, but as said you guys are so far skewed you can’t accept that someone else can have a “live and let live” attitude towards something that you hate so much, so it must be an agenda.
Anyways, I don’t deny my part in continuing the disagreements, but they only start because people love arguing with me. I typically don’t sling back the insults that are fired at me and I don’t go looking for fights, so you guys can either ignore me or except your fate for trying to disprove something that has already been proven to be correct by thousands of people before me.
There you go again calling your opinions facts. Not to mention the revisionist history regarding your prior arguments here. In fact, I agree greenhouse gasses warm the environment. We disagree with the extent. People did land on the moon. Trump is an egotistical loudmouth and kind of a douche. None of that justifies half the shit you say about him here though. Guess what does ? Your obvious TDS. I think the disconnect with the drag queens is that you pretend you are just live and let live about it, which I would say 90% of the population agrees. You seem however to think that exposing kids to flaming ass queer behavior is " Live and let live". It is not.

And people don't love to argue with you any more than you love to argue with them, be smug and pretend your opinions are facts.
 
There you go again calling your opinions facts. Not to mention the revisionist history regarding your prior arguments here. In fact, I agree greenhouse gasses warm the environment. We disagree with the extent. People did land on the moon. Trump is an egotistical loudmouth and kind of a douche. None of that justifies half the shit you say about him here though. Guess what does ? Your obvious TDS. I think the disconnect with the drag queens is that you pretend you are just live and let live about it, which I would say 90% of the population agrees. You seem however to think that exposing kids to flaming ass queer behavior is " Live and let live". It is not.

And people don't love to argue with you any more than you love to argue with them, be smug and pretend your opinions are facts.

Name one thing that you think qualifies as TDS. Everyone is quick to throw the word around but not once have they backed it up.

And the drag queen is 100% live and let live. They aren’t mandatory. People choose to go to them. Feel free to choose not to. That’s all there is to say about it
 
Generally speaking, none of my “opinions” here are provocative
It’s not what you believe, it’s that you are condescending to anyone that disagrees, and then consistently avoid, obfuscate, conflate and otherwise confuse the debate when it’s obvious you’re wrong.
 
…I don’t give a shit about greenhouse gases. I highlight the FACT that when the world shut down (Every climate crazies dream), planet temps increased. This incredible fact should give climate crazies pause, inspire reflection, etc., but instead we get, “Yeah but eventually it will get cooler.” It’s pathetic.
 
You’re pretty naive if you don’t think that science can be co-opted to further powerful interests.
It can be for sure. That’s why I stress looking at the data and not the story

It’s not what you believe, it’s that you are condescending to anyone that disagrees, and then consistently avoid, obfuscate, conflate and otherwise confuse the debate when it’s obvious you’re wrong.

That’s because whenever I present factual data, you and others come at me with a story. You guys are confusing the “debate” by constantly adding more and more shit to it because the stuff I originally post cannot be disputed. That’s the straw man
 
That’s because whenever I present factual data, you and others come at me with a story. You guys are confusing the “debate” by constantly adding more and more shit to it because the stuff I originally post cannot be disputed. That’s the straw man
Name one example where you think this has happened.
 
…I don’t give a shit about greenhouse gases. I highlight the FACT that when the world shut down (Every climate crazies dream), planet temps increased. This incredible fact should give climate crazies pause, inspire reflection, etc., but instead we get, “Yeah but eventually it will get cooler.” It’s pathetic.

You don’t have to give a shit about greenhouses. But if someone (me) posts about greenhouse gases, it’s pointless for someone else (you) to use data about things at aren’t greenhouse gases to dispute it.

It’s not an incredible fact. It’s what they were expecting to happen. Thats why they jumped on the opportunity to do that test to get real world confirmation. That’s how science works. Unfortunately for you, it doesn’t disagree with anything I’ve posted on the topic.
 
Name one example where you think this has happened.
This study you keep posting for one. Bringing up a 50 year prediction that another ice age is coming. Taylor swift and bill gates memes. Paper straws, apocalyptic headlines, the list goes on for just this topic.
 
You don’t have to give a shit about greenhouses. But if someone (me) posts both greenhouse gases, it’s pointless for someone else (you) to use data about things at aren’t greenhouse gases to dispute it.
I didn’t do that. I’m saying greenhouse gases are irrelevant.
It’s not an incredible fact. It’s what they were expecting to happen. Thats why they jumped on the opportunity to do that test to get real world confirmation. That’s how science works. Unfortunately for you, it doesn’t disagree with anything I’ve posted on the topic.
That the earth temps would increase when industry shut down was expected?!
 
Back
Top