Floyd Eye
Well-known member
You mean men, explaining to me the word of god ?Interesting perspective but the church has theology to help you understand this stuff.
Let no man be reverend unto you. Sound familiar ?
You mean men, explaining to me the word of god ?Interesting perspective but the church has theology to help you understand this stuff.
Yes it does. 1 Corinthians 4:15 is the basis for having a spiritual father.You mean men, explaining to me the word of god ?
Let no man be reverend unto you. Sound familiar ?
The church has had all the answers since it's inception but it's anything but blind faith.Like I said, interesting. And there is no way any one person has all the right answers. Or really any of the answers. After all, your lot is blind faith, yes ?
Yes, Christ is that light and everything is created through him and is therefore his possession.The big bang theory. That could easily be the way "God" created the universe. Let there be light, Kablam. Light.
@Floyd Eye what I mean to say is that per scripture is "all testimony is to be established by two or three witnesses".The church has had all the answers since it's inception but it's anything but blind faith.
The bible literally says it is blind faith. Faith by definition is blind faith. And faith in the existence of god, any god, is blind faith.The church has had all the answers since it's inception but it's anything but blind faith.
Yes, Christ is that light and everything is created through him and is therefore his possession.
That is the same as assuming anything believed by more than one person is fact. And it's especially specious when you consider that saints and martyrs are not looked at as specially enlightened by most people. Other than Catholics.@Floyd Eye what I mean to say is that per scripture is "all testimony is to be established by two or three witnesses".
The prophets, the saints, and the martyrs have established that testimony so it's not "blind".
James 2:14-20 ......Faith without works is deadThe bible literally says it is blind faith. Faith by definition is blind faith. And faith in the existence of god, any god, is blind faith.
The orthodox church. Pre-denominational.Also the church is anyplace where 2 or more men are gathered in his name. You'll need to be much more specific.
Noah was not looked up to by most people of his day until he was on the boat while they were busy drowning so what you are saying doesn't have bearing to the conversation. It's not a popularity contest and even if it is christian forms of religion are still the most popular.And it's especially specious when you consider that saints and martyrs are not looked at as specially enlightened by most people.
Pre-denominational was like the disciples with Jesus. As far as I can tell there have existed disputes about church authenticity, authority and doctrine since just after that.The orthodox church. Pre-denominational.
I wasn't referring to popularity. More that if you are using people, things, as evidence, it's only going to be considered evidence to those who believe those things existed in the first place.James 2:14-20 ......Faith without works is dead
You aren't saved by blind faith at all. In fact, you are aren't saved in the past tense at all until the fat lady sings. It's an ongoing process while you are breathing.
The orthodox church. Pre-denominational.
Noah was not looked up to by most people of his day until he was on the boat while they were busy drowning so what you are saying doesn't have bearing to the conversation. It's not a popularity contest and even if it is christian forms of religion are still the most popular.
Sure in most things. Not the existence of god though. Unless you can point to some incontrovertible proof that god exists, all faith in god is blind faith.Blind faith is not faith. They are different concepts.
There are the 12 and there are the 70. And you are correct which is why they held council with clergy from across the known world gathered to straighten out the disputes. Even the bible itself records some of those heretical people.Pre-denominational was like the disciples with Jesus. As far as I can tell there have existed disputes about church authenticity, authority and doctrine since just after that.
Isn't it all suspect to you that any and all churches think theirs is the only "True" church ?Pre-denominational was like the disciples with Jesus. As far as I can tell there have existed disputes about church authenticity, authority and doctrine since just after that.
No, faith is believing in something that you can’t prove, but not without any reason or evidence. Blind faith is believing in something with no reason or evidence.Sure in most things. Not the existence of god though. Unless you can point to some incontrovertible proof that god exists, all faith in god is blind faith.
The apostles walked with Christ and all but one were martyred. What's the motivating factor? Belief in a made up lie? You can't expect video footage. To the unbeliever there is no evidence that would be acceptable to convince them otherwise. It's a heart issue.I wasn't referring to popularity. More that if you are using people, things, as evidence, it's only going to be considered evidence to those who believe those things existed in the first place.
Yeah, I understand that. There is no evidence god exists. Therefore, blind faith.No, faith is believing in something that you can’t prove, but not without any reason or evidence. Blind faith is believing in something with no reason or evidence.
Yes but only the orthodox church can back it up. Everything after it is heretical, and splintered from orthodoxy or other heretical sects. They cannot prove those claims.Isn't it all suspect to you that any and all churches think theirs is the only "True" church ?