S
Strandberg Junkie
Banned
member
I evaluate based on the merits of the study itself, not necessarily where it was published; provided the data wasn't maliciously corrupted to justify results or push an agenda.
Wait, how does that work then?
Do you already have some data you are going to use to check whatever I post up against?
What criteria would you use to determine malicious methods?
Almost seems like you already have your mind made up and it simply wouldn't matter what I post.
i.e., a waste of my time.