MadAsAHatter
Well-known member
You need to tell me. There's literally hundreds of sources. I don't want to waste my time.
How about the Karolinska Institute in Sweden?
I'm assuming you're worried that I'd just dismiss anything you post as not credible, fake, or something along those lines. I evaluate based on the merits of the study itself, not necessarily where it was published; provided the data wasn't maliciously corrupted to justify results or push an agenda. Just post a couple of the stats you have with the source so I can read how the figures were derived. If it was done properly then the data should hold up on its own regardless of where it was posted.