klugster
Active member
So does this mean my Mark III is finally worth enough I can retire on?
You may be onto something there. Welcome to R-TAccording to my search on google and chatgpt the Output transformer makes a difference when it comes to the tonal character, harmonic quality and overall sound.
The Power transformer indirectly influences the reliability and performance but not the tonal character, because it is only responsible for delivering the necessary voltages to the components. Meaning the components need a certain amount of voltage to function.
So when I see people talk about how much of a difference a transformer makes on the tonal character and sound it is the output transformer they are speaking of.
I think this is important to point out because some people like me have replaced the US power transformer to a 230V input with a new power transformer, and it doesn’t make the amp less attractive because it doesn’t impact the tone.
However the Output transformer does make a difference.
A III? No. But many think they’re worth north of 3000 dollars when they regularly sell for 1800So does this mean my Mark III is finally worth enough I can retire on?
you're gonna need a special IIC+ Coliseum for thatSo does this mean my Mark III is finally worth enough I can retire on?
Those aren't worth enough (yet) to retire on, however they are worth enough to take your family on a kick-ass tropical vacation.you're gonna need a special IIC+ Coliseum for that
Fair point. I think I read that Wizard and Alessandro do custom order their transformers from Mercury, so maybe they just know how to spec them right, not sureHammond does custom transformers from what I recall, I wouldn't be surprised if Mercury does too. In which case, all bets are off since the manufacturer could be specifying stuff that's non-standard in production model transformers.
So then if they're smart, to get the sound in everyone's head they'll make a reissue that sounds exactly like MOP.None of the Mark II amps I owned or played on sounded the same. Near as I can tell no two sound identical.
So if they could make one it's not going to sound like the ones you heard or used.
It wouldn't be too surprising if they released a Limited-Run IIC+ reissue ($$$). Perhaps one associated with an artist, but maybe not.So then if they're smart, to get the sound in everyone's head they'll make a reissue that sounds exactly like MOP.
makes sense from a material quality - I'd expect higher quality back in the '60s, but less consistency of quality - from caps to wire, and everything else; then factor in the MILSPEC vacuum tubes pre-mid 1970s which are higher quality than new tubes today...
I remember reading from a few sources that in the early days Marshall would use whatever they had around increasing the range of variability from one amp to the next, one hour, day, week, month to the next.
it's alchemy shrouded in mystery as many of the amp alchemists of the '60s are no longer with us.
Ryan "Fluff" Bruce just said on a MB facebook group that Randall was fired, and that his employees were told he retired but no one believes that. He has a you tuber reputation to defend so its quite the claim. still no official word, but there probably won't be.
This is true. There's a reissue 2 channel recto and a reissue C+ coming. A lot of us already know this. My guitar tech is an amp play tester and has already tested them.This is not a rumor at all, I don’t know how else to say it, I’ve seen the amp with my own eyes lol. Like, on a cab, next to the chrome chassis rev G model that’s coming out as well. They exist and it’s for sure a thing, this is not speculation or rumor.
GoddamnIf anyone wants to check out a Pre-Gibson c+ let me know. I was comparing 3 of them this morning since I didn't have to work today.View attachment 332514View attachment 332511
what a creep!Goddamn