You're just repeating what you were taught. You have no independent understanding or grasp of the matter. ... Exactly what @NowYou'rePlayingWithPower was saying. That's what you get in academia these days I guess
I'm asking you to substantiate your assertion that the mathematical formulas "prove" that the conventional astronomical model is true. Yeah, I admit that I don't have that level of math understanding, but you don't either and you're the one making the claim.
"Aliens" is a repackaging of (some) evil spirit beings the same way "space" is repackaging the heavens the same way "polar vortex" is a repackaging of an Albert clipper. Control the language. Ever read communion by Whitley Strieber? He gets an owl as a screen memory after he's abducted. An owl is prominent animal in the occult. The grey "aliens" are eerily similar in appearance to the being "aiwass" that aleister crowley said he was in contact with.The "alien" abduction experiences people are report are generally exceedingly negative in nature. I guess it's not an absolute but I'd say it's pretty easy and safe for me to make this conclusion.
Typical alien depictions don’t seem to evoke depictions of demons though. And aliens seem to be understood as physical beings with advanced technology, while demons more like ghosts that can possess. I dunno, just thinking out loud. Interesting stuff. There is a phenomenon of encounters with “Machine elves” for users of DMT, maybe other psychedelics. That might be an interesting crossover of both genres. You can look up visual representations.
those fallen ones were some nasty jokers according to ole Enoch....
Grey aliens look extremely demonic to me and most of the encounters people have with them are very negative. That says demon to me.
It's probably the coolest to you because like most non christians you value head knowledge over heart knowledge. It is a good book though and it part of the apocryphal works in orthodoxy.
I haven’t read either, will have to look into that.
I liked the imagery it evoked, and honestly it seemed more “Christian” than any Old Testament book, so it puzzled me why at least the Christian’s didn’t canonize it. What’s heart knowledge?
I don’t believe you but cool, watchya building?Amp modding.
Matthew Mark Luke John are probably the most important part of the bible vs Enoch because the gospel is the story of Jesus whereas Enoch is just a record of pre-history. The apostles walked with Christ so to a practicing Christian they are the most important books.
That makes sense. Enoch does have really clear messianic verses as I recall, more than other OT books.
I don't believe you even play guitar.
Pretty much all the canon and apocrypha have messianic ties or they wouldn't have been included. My theory is a sharp student of hebrew would be able to suss out the messiah from Genesis alone.
Yeah, I’ve seen the supposed prophecies in Genesis. My impression is that the majority of the messianic prophecies in the OT are subjective, or quite tenuous. Maybe in Hebrew there is a more apparent case to be made.
Even in the passover: the blood is smeared in a cross shaped pattern. the top of the doorway, and sides, forming a bloody cross. The lamb is roasted upright with a crossbeam in the chest area. The matzah bread is striped and pierced with holes, The afikomen is the matzah hidden and the child that finds it gets a prize. All of the OT festivals and holy days can be tied to Jesus Christ.
