No pornhub in Tejas sucks to be them. Way to go republicans.

  • Thread starter Thread starter shar-vell Dan
  • Start date Start date
MadAsAHatter said:
Well I was actually making a joke, but okay. I don't think there needs to be legislation to ban/permit porn. People just need to take accountability for their own actions and parents shouldn't rely on the gov't to parent their kid. As long as it's not being readily handed out in schools and libraries I don't really give a crap if there's a hidden back room at Blockbuster for the adults.

I do find it amusing that you always claim to not be a leftist, but you're fine with dismantling the foundation of our country's government. Maybe change your username to Kamala-Gleesack.

Edit: Hairass-Gleesack sounds funnier. :LOL:
Click to expand...

I don’t think adjusting the 2nd amendment to reflect the times is dismantling anything. I’m all for people feeling safe and wanting to protect themselves, but I think there needs to be a distinct line between civilian weaponry and military weaponry, and apparently that can’t be done without violating people’s rights
 
acceptance said:
Are there "obscenity" laws in the Constitution?
Click to expand...
It's an innovation to have repackaged the first to include obscene material. The founders, and citizenry, would never have allowed it. Until playboy in the 50's i.e post modern thinking, it was never considered.
acceptance said:
I think we have a right to free speech, which includes the right to read and view what one desires.
Click to expand...
This is why we have minor attracted persons, er, pedophiles, who would also like the same rights to view obscene material. If you look into most of the people, like Kinsey, who helped fuel the sexual and counter cultural revolution, you will find they were just pedophiles.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
I don’t think adjusting the 2nd amendment to reflect the times is dismantling anything. I’m all for people feeling safe and wanting to protect themselves, but I think there needs to be a distinct line between civilian weaponry and military weaponry, and apparently that can’t be done without violating people’s rights
Click to expand...
That distinction is already made with NFA weapons so you are arguing for something that already exists. Without applying for, and receiving permission from your local sheriff, you can't possess a military level weapon. At least your argument is consistent that you want to adjust the constitution to reflect the times i.e to include obscenity in 1st amendment covered activities so I give you that much.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
This where I think the disconnect comes from with some many debates about guns. Many of The biggest advocates for gun laws have children and school shootings in mind.

If a kid gets a hold of a gun it’s not the gun’s fault right? Probably the parent’s fault?
Same with a kid looking at porn. It’s easy to see what your kids are looking at online, and also easy to control what they are looking at online (on devices that you own or bought for them).

So when someone argues that we shouldn’t strengthen gun laws just because a bunch of kids are dying from them, it’s odd that some people are so quick to want to legislate other dangers.
Click to expand...
That’s a fair point. With the porn. Not the guns. Lol
 
Regardless, porn is much different than it was in the 50's or when we were teens. About the craziest thing you could find in a Penthouse when I was a teen is two girls getting it on, and even that was rare. Now days.... :(
 
311splawndude said:
Regardless, porn is much different than it was in the 50's or when we were teens. About the craziest thing you could find in a Penthouse when I was a teen is two girls getting it on, and even that was rare. Now days.... :(
Click to expand...

Reminds me of a lyric

“Do you think you could bear it?
Would you put up with the mess today’s kids do?
All the shit that surrounds us
How could you make love if fist fucking was all you knew?”
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Reminds me of a lyric

“Do you think you could bear it?
Would you put up with the mess today’s kids do?
All the shit that surrounds us
How could you make love if fist fucking was all you knew?”
Click to expand...

There once was a man from Nantucket
Who's something something suck it
I forget the rest, but your mother's a whore.

1728334506413.png
 
Dan Gleesak said:
It seems the same to me.
Click to expand...
Yeah it is the same. It’s on the parents in both cases. The difference being kids aren’t allowed to buy guns by law. Unless you think there should be legal consequences for kids buying or possessing porn ?
 
Floyd Eye said:
Yeah it is the same. It’s on the parents in both cases. The difference being kids aren’t allowed to buy guns by law. Unless you think there should be legal consequences for kids buying or possessing porn ?
Click to expand...

porn is free though.
It’s also hard to define.
Is it really the nudity that is damaging to underage people?
 
311splawndude said:
Don't be so dense Daniel :lol:
Click to expand...

I’m not being dense. If people are going to play the “oh it’s bad for kids” card, that opens up a huge grey area of things. I’m wondering why specifically pornography.
If details can’t be given it’s just another case of “let’s try and make this thing I don’t like illegal”
 
You can clearly tell who the ones are in this thread who want to masturbate without showing their I.D.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
porn is free though.
It’s also hard to define.
Is it really the nudity that is damaging to underage people?
Click to expand...
No. And I'm not sure if it's damaging other than the really extreme shit might be traumatic depending on the age of the kid. Porn these days, as 311 pointed out, is a far cry from what it was when I was a kid. A 6 year old watching 3 black guys spit roast a bitch that looks like mommy might be a little damaging.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
I’m not being dense. If people are going to play the “oh it’s bad for kids” card, that opens up a huge grey area of things. I’m wondering why specifically pornography.
If details can’t be given it’s just another case of “let’s try and make this thing I don’t like illegal”
Click to expand...
I think it might be hard to disprove a link between sex addiction/porn addiction and childhood exposure to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top